[CWG-Stewardship] [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Re: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for CCWG-Accountability

[Seun Ojedeji]

Do you mind explaining the difference Kavous? perhaps I missed something.

I sure don't intend to "rush into conclusion" and will be good to know
which part of my statement implies that.

Thanks

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 3 Apr 2016 22:02, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Seun
> Thanks for reply
> You are rushing into conclusions
> ENVISAGING A MULTI YEAR BUDGET IS ENTIRELY diffrent is blocking a three
> years Budget for PTI
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
> 2016-04-03 20:59 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
>
>> Sent from my LG G4
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>> On 3 Apr 2016 6:22 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I am not in agreement to define a three years blocked budget
>> >
>> SO: Kavous, the act of defining a multi-year budget for PTI is an
>> implementation item from the CWG proposal. Considering that the proposal
>> has already been forwarded to NTIA, i believe you will agree that we have
>> passed the stage of modifying what was proposed.
>>
>> Regards
>> > Kavouss
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160403/e996037d/attachment.html>