[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments

[Greg Shatan]

Elise --

You can speak my  name (and it's not "Voldemort").

Greg 😈

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Lindeberg, Elise <elise.lindeberg at nkom.no>
wrote:

> I agree with - if ICANN is a part of the contract anyway, let’s put a
> consultation right in predictable frame.
>
>
>
> Elise
>
>
>
> *Fra:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *På vegne av* Greg Shatan
> *Sendt:* 12. april 2016 15:43
> *Til:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Kopi:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Emne:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for
> Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments
>
>
>
> If ICANN is a direct party to the contract, a consultation right seems
> appropriate.  I expect they would find a way to make their concerns known
> with or without a formal consultation right, so it's probably better to
> define how that will happen.  This can avoid unfortunately timed ad hoc
> interventions.
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> I have two thoughts on this:
>
> ·         Because PTI will be an affiliate of ICANN, would the
> consultation with PTI suffice?
>
> ·         ICANN could comment during the public comment period.
>
>
>
> That said, I don’t initially see any problems with a consultation with
> ICANN except that it might add more time to the process.  Therefore, if it
> happens, I think it should happen in parallel with one of the other steps.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:40 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for
> Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Please review below and provide any relevant input as soon as possible.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com
> <sflanagan at sidley.com>]
> *Sent:* 12 April 2016 02:33
> *To:* Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC
> Charter Amendments
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> There is an open question in the ICANN draft bylaws relating to
> IFRT-recommended amendments to the IANA Naming Function Contract, SOW and
> the CSC Charter (Section 18.6(a)(i)).  ICANN had requested a consultation
> right on amendments to the Contract and SOW since it is a party to the
> Contract.  On the CWG call, there was a comment on whether the consultation
> right for the ICANN board was appropriate.   The CWG proposal does not
> contemplate an ICANN consultation right.
>
>
>
> Paragraph 272 of the CWG proposal states:
>
>
>
> 272               The review could identify recommended amendments to the
> IANA SOW to address any performance deficiencies, or to the CSC charter to
> address any issues or deficiencies. The process of developing and approving
> amendments will take place through a defined process that includes, at
> minimum, the following steps, in advance of an amendment to either document
> being proposed:
>
> *›*        Consultation with the IANA Functions Operator;
>
> *›*        Consultation with the CSC;
>
> *›*        Public input session for ccTLD and gTLD operators; and
>
> *›*        Public comment period.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sharon
>
>
>
> *SHARON R. FLANAGAN*
>
>
> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
> 555 California Street
> Suite 2000
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> +1 415 772 1271
> sflanagan at sidley.com
> www.sidley.com
>
> *[image: SIDLEY]*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160412/2808927b/attachment.html>