[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments

[Matthew Shears]

Tend to agree with Chuck's "two thoughts".

Matthew

On 4/12/2016 9:11 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> I have two thoughts on this:
>
> ·Because PTI will be an affiliate of ICANN, would the consultation 
> with PTI suffice?
>
> ·ICANN could comment during the public comment period.
>
> That said, I don’t initially see any problems with a consultation with 
> ICANN except that it might add more time to the process. Therefore, if 
> it happens, I think it should happen in parallel with one of the other 
> steps.
>
> Chuck
>
> *From:*cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan 
> Robinson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:40 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IFRT Recommendations for 
> Contract, SOW or CSC Charter Amendments
>
> All,
>
> Please review below and provide any relevant input as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> *From:* Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com]
> *Sent:* 12 April 2016 02:33
> *To:* Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org 
> <mailto:cwg-client at icann.org>>
> *Subject:* [client com] IFRT Recommendations for Contract, SOW or CSC 
> Charter Amendments
>
> Dear All,
>
> There is an open question in the ICANN draft bylaws relating to 
> IFRT-recommended amendments to the IANA Naming Function Contract, SOW 
> and the CSC Charter (Section 18.6(a)(i)).  ICANN had requested a 
> consultation right on amendments to the Contract and SOW since it is a 
> party to the Contract.  On the CWG call, there was a comment on 
> whether the consultation right for the ICANN board was appropriate.  
>  The CWG proposal does not contemplate an ICANN consultation right.
>
> Paragraph 272 of the CWG proposal states:
>
> 272The review could identify recommended amendments to the IANA SOW to 
> address any performance deficiencies, or to the CSC charter to address 
> any issues or deficiencies. The process of developing and approving 
> amendments will take place through a defined process that includes, at 
> minimum, the following steps, in advance of an amendment to either 
> document being proposed:
>
> *›*Consultation with the IANA Functions Operator;
>
> *›*Consultation with the CSC;
>
> *›*Public input session for ccTLD and gTLD operators; and
>
> *›*Public comment period.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sharon
>
> *SHARON R. FLANAGAN*
>
>
> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*
> 555 California Street
> Suite 2000
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> +1 415 772 1271
> sflanagan at sidley.com <mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com>
> www.sidley.com <http://www.sidley.com>
>
> *SIDLEY*
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is 
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and 
> any attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-- 

Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org
E: mshears at cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987

CDT's Annual Dinner, Tech Prom, is April 6, 2016. Don't miss out - register at cdt.org/annual-dinner.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160412/25da16df/attachment.html>