[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] FW: Revisions to CWG-related Bylaw Provisions

Thu Apr 14 21:46:48 UTC 2016

Chuck, this is consistent with the CWG-Stewardship proposal language (paragraphs 283 and 393). 

I don’t believe that this was an oversight in the proposal, because I remember long discussions on composition of each of these teams. To find the rationale for each of these, I would need to go back and do some digging through earlier drafts and transcripts. 

-- 
Grace Abuhamad
Manager, Public Policy

ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
801 17th Street NW, Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20006

Direct: +1 202 249 7545 | Mobile: +1 310 200 7638

Interested in the IANA Stewardship Transition? 
LEARN MORE. STAY UPDATED. FOLLOW. ENGAGE. 

From:  <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>
Date:  Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 5:15 PM
To:  Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>, "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] FW: Revisions to CWG-related Bylaw Provisions

I note that Section 18.7 (COMPOSITION OF IFR TEAMS) still says: “Two representatives appointed by the Registries Stakeholder Group”.  As I previously pointed out: this is inconsistent with the composition of a SIFR for which the RySG appoints three representatives; and it is one less than the ccTLDs.  At a minimum I request an explanation why this change wasn’t made and also why the ccTLD registries would be allowed one more representative than gTLD registries.

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 10:19 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] FW: Revisions to CWG-related Bylaw Provisions

FYI

From: Flanagan, Sharon [mailto:sflanagan at sidley.com] 
Sent: 13 April 2016 18:01
To: Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
Subject: [client com] FW: Revisions to CWG-related Bylaw Provisions

Dear All,

Attached are revisions to the bylaws that we have sent to ICANN for incorporation into the current draft.  These include the feedback we have received thus far from CWG, as well as certain other clean up edits.

Best regards,

Sharon

SHARON R. FLANAGAN

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
+1 415 772 1271
sflanagan at sidley.com

From: Flanagan, Sharon 
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:00 AM
To: Samantha.Eisner at icann.org; John Jeffrey; Grace Abuhamad; Bernard Turcotte
Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN at adlercolvin.com; Gregory, Holly
Subject: Revisions to CWG-related Bylaw Provisions

All,

Attached are edits to the CWG-related bylaw provisions:  Articles 16-19, which edits are attached, and Section 22.4(f), which edits are below. 

CWG is still discussing certain open points.

Section 22.4(f):

Best regards,

Sharon

SHARON R. FLANAGAN

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
+1 415 772 1271
sflanagan at sidley.com

****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160414/63b10d72/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 36942 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160414/63b10d72/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160414/63b10d72/smime-0001.p7s>