[CWG-Stewardship] Clarification on PTI scope

[Seun Ojedeji]

Putting Xavier in copy, hopefully he could provide a quick clarification as
well.

Cheers!

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 23 Apr 2016 20:27, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> From my understanding of PTI was that it's going to be the new IANA that
> will serve the 3OCs (even though numbers and protocols contracts with
> ICANN).
>
> If my high-level understanding above is right, then i think there may be
> something wrong in the fy17 draft budget which has just been brought to my
> attention.
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-opplan-budget-fy17-05mar16-en.pdf
>
> Page 25 item 4 says the following:
>
> PTI- New legal entity, destined to host activities and costs of the IANA
> functions in service of
> the *Names community*
>
> Then page 27 seem to imply that PTI will indeed serve the names alone. At
> the moment, I have not considered the application of this new arrangement
> and unless I am missing something, I don't think this was what was proposed.
>
> Regards
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160423/dfba86f4/attachment.html>