[CWG-Stewardship] Clarification on PTI scope

[Alan Greenberg]

Xavier's message was in direct response to mine just below it and he was confirming what I said.

Alan 
-- 
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

On April 23, 2016 7:12:20 PM EDT, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>Thanks for your response Xavier, just so this is not mixed up
>unnecessarily
>as the wording of your response seems not to answer my question(it even
>seem to be authenticating my concern); the CWG even in February did not
>propose what was reflected in the budget published on the 5th neither
>does
>the conversion happened post-ICANN55.
>
>However what I have gotten here(from others) is that it may indeed be a
>mistake and there is a common understanding of the status-quo, which is
>the
>most important.
>
>I will leave it at that.
>
>Regards
>
>Sent from my LG G4
>Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>On 23 Apr 2016 11:56 p.m., "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>wrote:
>
>> All,
>> I confirm that what appears in the budget document under public
>comment
>> since 5 March relative to PTI is a result of a proposal designed in
>the
>> course of February, pre-ICANN55 and all the evolutive conversations
>that
>> have been happening since then.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> Best,
>>
>> Xavier
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2016, at 14:37, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Correct. The budget document is dated 5 March and a lot has changed
>since
>> then. There is no doubt that all three functions will be performed
>under
>> the auspices of PTI.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 23/04/2016 04:07 PM, James Gannon wrote:
>>
>> I think this is a leftover item from the initial ICANN staff drafting
>of
>> PTI, which clarification that the IOTF made to the implementing ICANN
>staff
>> on our first call and have resolved that as per the CWG proposal PTI
>will
>> be managing all 3 functions.
>>
>> -JG
>>
>> From: < cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Christopher
>> Wilkinson < lists at christopherwilkinson.eu>
>> Date: Saturday 23 April 2016 at 20:46
>> To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com >
>> Cc: " cwg-stewardship at icann.org" < cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Clarification on PTI scope
>>
>> Good catch, Seun.
>>
>> There is no doubt in my mind that PTI was defined as the successor to
>> *all* the IANA functions.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> CW
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 23 Apr 2016, at 21:27, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com >
>wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> From my understanding of PTI was that it's going to be the new IANA
>that
>> will serve the 3OCs (even though numbers and protocols contracts with
>> ICANN).
>>
>> If my high-level understanding above is right, then i think there may
>be
>> something wrong in the fy17 draft budget which has just been brought
>to my
>> attention.
>>
>>
>>
>https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-opplan-budget-fy17-05mar16-en.pdf
>>
>> Page 25 item 4 says the following:
>>
>> PTI- New legal entity, destined to host activities and costs of the
>IANA
>> functions in service of
>> the *Names community*
>>
>> Then page 27 seem to imply that PTI will indeed serve the names
>alone. At
>> the moment, I have not considered the application of this new
>arrangement
>> and unless I am missing something, I don't think this was what was
>proposed.
>>
>> Regards
>> Sent from my LG G4
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160423/369a4442/attachment.html>