[CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016

Sun Aug 7 16:04:17 UTC 2016

Seun
NO
PLS DO NOT MAKE MY JOB HARD..
WHY NOT A RED MARK WORD VERSION
Regards
Kavouss

2016-08-07 17:42 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:

> Hello Kavous,
>
> An option could be that you look at the PDF and make your comment on the
> word version(though you can make comment on the pdf as well)
>
> Another option is if you (or someone) has the previous clean version then
> one can produce a redline off the two clean versions.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 7 Aug 2016 4:37 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Andrew,
>> Tks again for your kind reply.
>> Please send me a red mark  Word Version and I Will reply today.
>> I HAVE SOME CONCERS ON SOME OF THE  CHANGED MADE  BY GREC
>> Regards
>> Kavouss
>>
>>
>> 2016-08-07 17:28 GMT+02:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>:
>>
>>> I don't know whetheer you will get that before tomorrow, and that is
>>> really rather late.  Can you at least say what your concerns are?
>>> There really isn't a lot of time: this needs to go to public comment
>>> on Thursday.  An additional day to wait for the comments would be bad.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> A
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 05:14:50PM +0200, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>> > Seun,
>>> > I know that a word version was included but the Word Version is a clean
>>> > Text and it is difficult to identify the changes .I wish to see what
>>> was
>>> > the changes introduced by Greg
>>> > I still need the red mark text in WORD VERSION.
>>> > Regards
>>> > Kavouss
>>> >
>>> > 2016-08-07 14:09 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > > A word version was included in Greg's mail
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards
>>> > >
>>> > > Sent from my LG G4
>>> > > Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>> > >
>>> > > On 7 Aug 2016 10:36 a.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <
>>> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Grec,
>>> > >> Thank you very much for the amendments. I do not agree with some of
>>> them
>>> > >> In order to enable me to provide my counter comments to you, pls
>>> provide
>>> > >> a word version of your amendment as soon as convinient
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Kavouss
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 2016-08-07 0:22 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> CWG,
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I am forwarding a revised draft of the proposed Community Agreement
>>> > >>> relating to the IANA IPR.  In addition to any other comments you
>>> may have,
>>> > >>> I draw your attention to the two specific items in the email
>>> below: (1)
>>> > >>> identifying an entity to sign for the names community, and (2)
>>> providing a
>>> > >>> brief description of the IANA Services used by the names community
>>> (
>>> > >>> *see* Exhibit A for descriptions provided by the other
>>> communities).
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> This will be the subject of further refinement by the IPR
>>> collaborative
>>> > >>> group early in the week, with the goal of initiating a public
>>> comment
>>> > >>> period as soon as possible after the CWG-IANA meeting on Thursday.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Greg
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> > >>> From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer at sidley.com>
>>> > >>> Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM
>>> > >>> Subject: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft:
>>> 08-05-2016
>>> > >>> To: Client <cwg-client at icann.org>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Dear Client Committee,
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Attached please find a revised draft of the proposed Community
>>> Agreement
>>> > >>> for your review and comment.  This is an iterative version
>>> prepared jointly
>>> > >>> by counsel (Sidley) to the CWG and counsel to the IETF Trust to
>>> reflect the
>>> > >>> 7-point discussion items.  To be clear, it is still a work in
>>> progress, but
>>> > >>> we believe ready for the CWG to have an opportunity for review.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Two important issues to highlight:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 1) the Names Community needs to determine who will be the signatory
>>> > >>> party, acting on behalf of the Names Community, to the Community
>>> > >>> Agreement.  For your information, the attached draft has the
>>> organizations
>>> > >>> put forward to represent the Numbers and Protocols Communities; and
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 2) we need a brief description of the IANA services to be provided
>>> on
>>> > >>> behalf of the Names Community.  The following high-level
>>> description was
>>> > >>> included in a draft of the Naming Functions Agreement.  If this is
>>> > >>> acceptable for including here is well, please advise (or we ask
>>> the Client
>>> > >>> Committee to provide a sufficient description):
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The “*IANA Naming Function*” is comprised of:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (a)             Management of the DNS Root Zone (“*Root Zone
>>> Management*
>>> > >>> ”);
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (b)             Management of the .INT top-level domain;
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (c)              Maintenance of a repository of internationalized
>>> > >>> domain name tables and label generation rule sets; and
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> (d)             Provision of other services related to the
>>> management
>>> > >>> of .INT top-level domains, at ICANN’s reasonable request and at
>>> ICANN’s
>>> > >>> expense.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Please provide any comment or feedback as soon as practical, as we
>>> are
>>> > >>> trying to finalize the draft for approval by the various
>>> stakeholders and
>>> > >>> release for public comment by Thursday.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thank you in advance.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Josh
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *Joshua Hofheimer*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *jhofheimer at sidley.com <jhofheimer at sidley.com>*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *(213) 896-6061 <%28213%29%20896-6061> (LA direct)*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *(650) 565-7561 <%28650%29%20565-7561> (Palo Alto direct)*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *(323) 708-2405 <%28323%29%20708-2405> (cell)*
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> *From:* iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net]
>>> *On
>>> > >>> Behalf Of *Jorge Contreras
>>> > >>> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2016 10:01 AM
>>> > >>> *To:* iana-ipr at nro.net
>>> > >>> *Subject:* [Iana-ipr] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> All – attached is a draft of the Community Agreement that Josh and
>>> I
>>> > >>> have collaborated on over the past two days.  We believe that it
>>> reflects
>>> > >>> the current requirements of the parties, and submit it for your
>>> review and
>>> > >>> discussion.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> A clean version, as well as a marked version against the draft of
>>> > >>> 07-30-16 (in PDF format) are attached.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Please note a few items that still need to be completed, including
>>> the
>>> > >>> description of the IANA Names Service, the identities of the CCG
>>> > >>> representatives, etc.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Best regards,
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Jorge
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Jorge L. Contreras
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Washington, DC 20036
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> contreraslegal at att.net
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and
>>> > >>> confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
>>> delete this
>>> > >>> message immediately.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> ************************************************************
>>> > >>> ****************************************
>>> > >>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that
>>> is
>>> > >>> privileged or confidential.
>>> > >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail
>>> and any
>>> > >>> attachments and notify us
>>> > >>> immediately.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> ************************************************************
>>> > >>> ****************************************
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>> Cwg-client mailing list
>>> > >>> Cwg-client at icann.org
>>> > >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>> > >>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> > >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > >> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>> > >> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> > >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Sullivan
>>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160807/76433351/attachment.html>