[CWG-Stewardship] Update & Planning for Feb 4th Meeting of CWG

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello,

Thanks for the share, did a quick read and have a few general
comments/question:

1. Isn't there a way to have the CSC charter separate and not incorporated
into the bylaw as the bylaw is looking quite bulky. That said, I note that
it's referred to as Annex D so I assume that is perhaps the only reference
that would exist in the bylaw?

2. I believe any change in the CSC charter should involved other chartering
SO/AC not just be based on the ccNSO and GNSO decision.

3. The CCWG proposed process to approve update of any text in the bylaw
(including CSC charter) should be applied. So I think the charter
update(depending on whether this will be standard or fundamental bylaw)
should be subject to board approval.

4. Some of the decision making does not recognise other community like ALAC
as part of the decision makers. For instance the decision process for SCWG.

5. Could it be indicated which of the texts goes to fundamental bylaw and
which one to standard?

Regards
On 2 Feb 2016 6:21 p.m., "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> A couple of updates since our previous meeting and ahead of our meeting on
> Thursday Feb 4 @ 16h00 UTC.
>
>
>
> We are waiting for the final wording from CWG Accountability in relation
> to our requirements on IANA Budget and IRP but now expect that these will
> be satisfactorily dealt with.
>
> As per Grace’s note on the CCWG agenda for their meeting today, these
> matters were subject to “final reading” by the CCWG today.
>
>
>
> On the series of questions presented by Sidley in preparation for drafting
> the proposed ICANN Bylaws to deal with the work of the CWG Stewardship,
> Grace’s email of Jan 25 sought further input from our group.
>
>
>
> Essentially we have:
>
> a.      Input from relevant DT leads (Thank-you!)
>
> b.      Input from staff
>
> c.      Remaining open questions
>
> Any input to point c above will be helpful.
>
>
>
> The plan (as per our last meeting and captured in Grace’s email of Jan 25) was
> to review and provide input so that responses can be provided to Sidley
> after the Feb 4 Call.
>
> This work to be done via the mailing list by using the ‘track changes’
> feature in Word. Staff will monitor the list and manage version control if
> needed.
>
> If there are outstanding issues, or disagreement on a response, this can
> be discussed further at the next meeting.
>
>
>
> *If you are able to review the document (re-attached for convenience) and
> provide any input over the next 24 hours or so, that will be very helpful.*
>
>
>
> Thank-you,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan & Lise
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160202/84ae50e2/attachment.html>