[CWG-Stewardship] CCWG Update

[Grace Abuhamad]

Thank you Chuck. Will pass this to the CCWG side.

From:  "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>
Date:  Friday, February 5, 2016 at 11:40 AM
To:  Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>, "cwg-stewardship at icann.org"
<cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject:  RE: CCWG Update

In the 2nd Reading Conclusions, item 1.a.iii.1 says: “ICANN should consider
modification of Registry Agreements with gTLD Operators to expand scope of
arbitration available thereunder to cover PTI service complaints.”  It seems
to me that the wording should be stronger: “ICANN must modify Registry
Agreements with gTLD Operators to expand scope of arbitration available
thereunder to cover PTI service complaints.”
 
I think the same change should be made later in the document when this
sentence occurs again.
 
Chuck
 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 5:18 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CCWG Update
 

Dear CWG-Stewardship,

 

Today the CCWG-Accountability published its latest version of its
recommendations on the IRP. Please see attached for text, and provide any
comments you may have. As noted in the email below:
* This version has been generated from the conclusion of the third reading
document and includes the modification required by the CWG for PTI and has
been reviewed by Becky Burr.
* As such you will find attached 3 versions, Word and PDF red lined as well
as a clean PDF version given the markups are extensive in some sections.
* Once this legal review is completed (48 hours -
​20:00 ​
 UTC Saturday), results of the review will be published on this list, a
final version will be generated and posted for final CCWG comments.​

I have highlighted the deadline above since it is important for the CWG to
follow this timeline as well. Considering the time pressure that the CCWG is
under, we should do our best to not delay them further. If you are able to
post on the CCWG list directly, that would be more efficient for them.
Otherwise, I will work with the co-Chairs to transfer the information in
time. 

 

I have also attached two documents that help track the status of the
CCWG-Accountability work overall.

 

Best,

Grace

 

From: <acct-staff-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Bernard Turcotte
<turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:45 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>, ACCT-Staff
<acct-staff at icann.org>
Subject: [Acct-Staff] CCWG - Recommendation 7 - Final draft version for
legal review

 

​
All,

 

​Per the request of the co-chairs we are publishing the final draft version
of  Annex 7  for legal review.

 

This version has been generated from the conclusion of the third reading
document and includes the modification required by the CWG for PTI and has
been reviewed by Becky Burr.

 

As such you will find attached 3 versions, Word and PDF red lined as well as
a clean PDF version given the markups are extensive in some sections.

 

Once this legal review is completed (48 hours -

​20:00 ​
UTC Saturday), results of the review will be published on this list, a final
version will be generated and posted for final CCWG comments.​
 

​Thank You.

 

B​ernard Turcotte

ICANN Staff Support for CCWG

 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160205/0168115a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160205/0168115a/smime-0001.p7s>