[CWG-Stewardship] CCWG Update

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Agree with that proposed text change Chuck...
On 6 Feb 2016 05:47, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to Chuck suggested modification. Minor question/comment:
>
> Section 4 of Annex 7 "...or, in the case of joint PDPs, without the
> support of the supporting organizations that developed such PDP.
>
> Considering that we are speaking in the context of names (and considering
> that the ccNSO has some level of independence policy wise?) Are there
> example of PDPs/policies developed by both the GNSO and ccNSO (since the
> ASO would be out of context here)? and secondly is there a definition of
> joint PDP somewhere?
>
> The "standing" section refers to "IRP Subgroup", may I know who those are
> and where they are defined?
>
> Regards
> On 5 Feb 2016 5:42 p.m., "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
>> In the 2nd Reading Conclusions, item 1.a.iii.1 says: “ICANN should
>> consider modification of Registry Agreements with gTLD Operators to expand
>> scope of arbitration available thereunder to cover PTI service complaints.”
>> It seems to me that the wording should be stronger: “ICANN must modify
>> Registry Agreements with gTLD Operators to expand scope of arbitration
>> available thereunder to cover PTI service complaints.”
>>
>>
>>
>> I think the same change should be made later in the document when this
>> sentence occurs again.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
>> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Grace Abuhamad
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2016 5:18 PM
>> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CCWG Update
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear CWG-Stewardship,
>>
>>
>>
>> Today the CCWG-Accountability published its latest version of its
>> recommendations on the IRP. Please see attached for text, and provide any
>> comments you may have. As noted in the email below:
>>
>>    - This version has been generated from the conclusion of the third
>>    reading document and includes the modification required by the CWG for PTI
>>    and has been reviewed by Becky Burr.
>>    - As such you will find attached 3 versions, Word and PDF red lined
>>    as well as a clean PDF version given the markups are extensive in some
>>    sections.
>>    - Once this legal review is completed *(48 hours -  *
>>
>> *​20:00 ​*
>>
>> * UTC Saturday)*, results of the review will be published on this list,
>> a final version will be generated and posted for final CCWG comments.​
>>
>> I have highlighted the deadline above since it is important for the CWG
>> to follow this timeline as well. Considering the time pressure that the
>> CCWG is under, we should do our best to not delay them further. If you are
>> able to post on the CCWG list directly, that would be more efficient for
>> them. Otherwise, I will work with the co-Chairs to transfer the information
>> in time.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have also attached two documents that help track the status of the
>> CCWG-Accountability work overall.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Grace
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<acct-staff-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Bernard Turcotte <
>> turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:45 PM
>> *To: *Accountability Cross Community <
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>, ACCT-Staff <
>> acct-staff at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *[Acct-Staff] CCWG - Recommendation 7 - Final draft version
>> for legal review
>>
>>
>>
>> ​
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> ​Per the request of the co-chairs we are publishing the final draft
>> version of  Annex 7  for legal review.
>>
>>
>>
>> This version has been generated from the conclusion of the third reading
>> document and includes the modification required by the CWG for PTI and has
>> been reviewed by Becky Burr.
>>
>>
>>
>> As such you will find attached 3 versions, Word and PDF red lined as well
>> as a clean PDF version given the markups are extensive in some sections.
>>
>>
>>
>> Once this legal review is completed (48 hours -
>>
>> ​20:00 ​
>>
>> UTC Saturday), results of the review will be published on this list, a
>> final version will be generated and posted for final CCWG comments.​
>>
>>
>>
>> ​Thank You.
>>
>>
>>
>> B​ernard Turcotte
>>
>> ICANN Staff Support for CCWG
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160207/d8556076/attachment-0001.html>