[CWG-Stewardship] FW: CWG-Stewardship Notification to GNSO Council concerning conditionality requirements

[Seun Ojedeji]

Well I don't know why this was written because almost every member of the
CWG chartering organisations have an expectation on the CCWG accountability
work and gave their approval to the final CWG proposal on similar reasoning
that the accountability dependencies are meet.

I expect that irrespective of this letter, the CWG is indeed following up
with its proposal dependencies on the CCWG by default.

Regards
On 12 Feb 2016 7:52 a.m., "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson at afilias.info>
wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> Please see attached from the GNSO.
>
>
>
> Jonathan & Lise
>
>
>
> *From:* Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org]
> *Sent:* 09 February 2016 19:40
> *To:* Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>; Lise Fuhr <Fuhr at etno.eu>
> *Cc:* James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>; Austin, Donna <
> Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>; Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>;
> Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>; gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Subject:* CWG-Stewardship Notification to GNSO Council concerning
> conditionality requirements
>
>
>
> Dear Jonathan, Lise,
>
>
>
> Please find attached for your attention a letter from the GNSO Council
> leadership concerning the CWG-Stewardship notification to the GNSO Council
> concerning the conditionality requirements in the CCWG-Accountability
> Supplemental Proposal.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160212/e149483a/attachment.html>