[CWG-Stewardship] CWG discussion

[Seun Ojedeji]

I believe the CWG normally make such check (also the lawyers does)
periodically and I expect that the co-chairs do have some coordinations as
well. Perhaps the exercise can be more prudent than it currently is, but
again one needs to ensure to make such checks when a specific direction is
envisaged/taken by the CCWG and not just based on comments by individuals.

That said, if there are indications that CCWG does not seem to go inline
with the CWG requirement, those who are in both groups could flag there
here.

As to the specific reference you made relating to IRP, considering that
this has gone through second reading (?) Perhaps it's good to make a quick
check. I personally don't see any inconsistency yet though.

Regards
On 21 Jan 2016 11:38, "Matthew Shears" <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I am not sure how this could be done but I think it important to assess on
> an ongoing basis how the CCWG is responding to the dependencies, the
> concerns raised by outside counsel in mid December and other points that
> may have been made with regards to the CCWG's evolving proposal.  The
> reason I raise this is because of a concern on the CCWG lists related to
> whether or not and how the IRP might be the appropriate mechanism for
> addressing the requirement from the CWG for an appeals mechanism for IANA
> related matters.  I think it important that we fully gauge the degree to
> which the work of the CCWG is satisfying CWG requirements, etc., during the
> various readings and prior to a final CCWG supplemental report being issued.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 20/01/2016 22:00, Lise Fuhr wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> I just sent our review to the CCWG proposal to the CCWG group. There has
>> been a three responses to the budget issues but none yet to the separation
>> power. The three responses were not in contradiction to each other so we
>> passed them on to the CCWG. Regarding the separation power - this will be
>> having a second reading within the CCWG tomorrow and we will have a
>> possibility to review this afterwards.
>>
>> We will also discuss the CCWG and our review at the call tomorrow.
>>
>> Best,
>> Lise
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
>> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of James Gannon
>> Sent: 20 January 2016 20:24
>> To: Paul M Kane - CWG; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG discussion
>>
>> For context some of this may be due to the incredible workload the CCWG
>> is under at the moment and with the large amount of overlap people may have
>> concentrated on that workload.
>>
>> -jg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/01/2016, 6:14 p.m., "cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org on behalf
>> of Paul M Kane - CWG" <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>> paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> At our last call it was decided we would have on-line discussion in
>>> advance of our next call ... this list has been silent.
>>>
>>> We have a call scheduled for tomorrow - what is the plan?
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>
> --
>
> Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
> Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org
> E: mshears at cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987
>
> CDT's Annual Dinner, Tech Prom, is April 6, 2016. Don't miss out -
> register at cdt.org/annual-dinner.
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160121/fbeb70e5/attachment-0001.html>