[CWG-Stewardship] CCWG-ACCT Request for Guidance on PTI - IRP - Please respond by 23h59 UTC Monday 25 January 2016

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

The issue is that the IRP can only act on the basis of a bylaw being
infringed. So either we need a bylaw that covers all the conditions on
which an appeal would be made, or an IRP that specifically made
provision for IANA performance issues.

We could also require a stand alone process that was separate from the IRP.

avri

On 22-Jan-16 07:33, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
>
> So the essential question is:
>
>  
>
> A.     Is an ICANN bylaw provision that allows for an IRP if ICANN
> fails to enforce the contract with PTI (for example, due to a material
> performance breach by PTI that is not cured) sufficient?
>
>  
>
> OR
>
>  
>
> B.     In addition to such an ICANN bylaw, is a separate process also
> required that would give direct customers a right to mediation or
> arbitration to address SLAs or other service issues?   
>
>  
>
> If B above, what type of process is necessary?
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus