[CWG-Stewardship] CCWG-ACCT Request for Guidance on PTI - IRP - Please respond by 23h59 UTC Monday 25 January 2016

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 20:22:35 UTC 2016


Becky,

have we specified that there should be such a provision in the Bylaws?

I guess we have left to "implementation" the agreement between ICANN and
PTI. I don't believe this has been picked up yet.  Am I correct?  If so,
that should probably change soon.

Greg

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>
wrote:

> Presumably if ICANN has an obligation in its Bylaws to ensure that PTI
> does the right thing, it will need to create the necessary enforcement
> mechanisms in its relationship with PTI.
>
>
> J. Beckwith Burr
> Neustar, Inc. / Deputy
> General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
> Office: +1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz
> <http://www.neustar.biz>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/25/16, 10:30 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Another nagging question I have, and one I think people tell me I am
> >wrong about becase of MOUs and contracts.
> >
> >In the PTI environment, given that ICANN remains the representative for
> >2 of the operational communities, and they resolve their IANA issues
> >with ICANN based on contracts and MOUs, how do we expect ICANN to get
> >what it needs from IANA on their behalf?
> >
> >Will, as today. they just tell IANA what to do and that will be the end
> >of it.
> >
> >The other OCs have indicated that any appeals mechanisms we create are
> >irrelevant to their case - they have their own methods.  But these
> >methods involve ICANN and not PTI.  Does ICANN need to appeal on their
> >behalf?  How does it do this?
> >
> >avri
> >
> >---
> >This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_antivir
> >us&d=CwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8
> >WDDkMr4k&m=sNRRTgQciMa9L6cxsRmapxpj1FEfitYPlAMn4NmB4Gk&s=VjHS6O9uycnwTVSFP
> >XRCBB11R2TBkKIwjKy1wEj8MaU&e=
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> >CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_
> >listinfo_cwg-2Dstewardship&d=CwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6
> >X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=sNRRTgQciMa9L6cxsRmapxpj1FEfitYPlAMn4Nm
> >B4Gk&s=0HwgSD_DtHwhuq9QOacLroSh0USPJ_sMNZMCTVHGh78&e=
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160125/002bb5f2/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list