[CWG-Stewardship] RZERC Charter for CWG review

[Alan Greenberg]

At 03/05/2016 06:21 PM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b67048f2cc5610531f78803"
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:yXSxQKq/XJtXcx74HQ6pcWbqx+b5hJebhZjStOfe2vcCaFJ13kuGboEAYxZedfvpfqoQkW2my/77y/UqGl8n/BZrde2MO+2rOPKk/tzSDPSclTyxHy+8MwGyIS5oWnPtJXGBJ+eJUMHEFVAZUN4McvB0XW/SRKMbIhIxtENblbs=
>
>Dear Co-Chairs/all,
>
>Looking at the acronym "RZERC" makes me feel I probably may have 
>been lagging behind with happenings within the CWG. ;-)
>
>Just a few clarification question/comments:
>
>- What is RZERC(I assume it's an acronym) as the charter does not 
>seem to include description.

It stands for the Root Zone Evolution Review Committee


>- I did a quick find on the ICG proposal and don't see reference to 
>"RZERC", what part of the ICG (to be specific CWG) proposal is this 
>implementing?

The name is new. The committee is described in paragraph 155 of the 
CWG proposal. 1155 of the ICG proposal I think.


>- I note that review of charter every 5 years is indicated, but 
>there seem to be no room to modify the charter in situations 
>requiring urgent need.

The 5 years is a mandatory review.


>- There is no process of replacing members indicated.

There is similarly no process for formally naming them. It is up to 
the appointing body (they all come from somewhere specific).


>- What part of the ICANN(or perhaps it's going to be applicable to 
>PTI ) bylaw recognises the formation of the RZERC

ICANN. The RZERC advises the ICANN Board and can act as an advisor to 
other groups as necessary (such as IANA itself)


>- Is the RZERC a new ICANN AC?

It is an advisory committee, but not an Advisory Committee in the 
sense of the ACs defined in the Bylaws. The Board has the 
responsibility of approving substantive changes in the RZ 
architecture and operation. The RZERC is a resource it uses to do the analysis.


>- Who funds the activities of the RZERC?

To the extent that it needs funds, ICANN.


>- Renumeration of the group is not explicitly indicated in the 
>charter; is this a volunteer group or a paid group?

They are paid double what I am paid and tripple what you are paid.


>- What will be the connection between RZERC and PTI board (since 
>they will be more closer to IANA than ICANN board post-transition) 
>since it seem this group reports/works with ICANN board?

No connection. The PTI Board oversees the physical operation of PTI. 
The ICANN Board, replacing NTIA, is responsible for RZ issues as per 
the previously mentioned section of the CWG/ICG reports.

Alan


>Regards
>Sent from my LG G4
>Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>On 3 May 2016 6:20 p.m., "Lise Fuhr" 
><<mailto:Fuhr at etno.eu>Fuhr at etno.eu> wrote:
>
>Dear CWG,
>
>
>
>Attached is the RZERC charter for your review. We would like to 
>receive your comments at 17 May at the latest 23.59 utc (2 week 
>review period). We furthermore plan to have a CWG call at the 12 may 
>where the RZERC Charter will be discussed.
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Jonathan and Lise
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
><mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:yXSxQKq/XJtXcx74HQ6pcWbqx+b5hJebhZjStOfe2vcCaFJ13kuGboEAYxZedfvpfqoQkW2my/77y/UqGl8n/BZrde2MO+2rOPKk/tzSDPSclTyxHy+8MwGyIS5oWnPtJXGBJ+eJUMHEFVAZUN4McvB0XW/SRKMbIhIxtENblbs=
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160503/de5e6686/attachment-0001.html>