[CWG-Stewardship] RZERC Charter for CWG review

[Mueller, Milton L]

> -----Original Message-----
> Given that the whole thing just advises the Board and can be reconstituted
> later if need be, I'm not too exercised about including a reasonably wide group
> of people.  Also, of course, we should hope that the sorts of innovations that
> might involve this group would be relatively rare.  But, for instance, there's
> current work afoot to rename all the root servers to give a little more room in
> the DNS priming query; and I'd like to believe that we all think maximal co-
> operation in making those sorts of changes is the sort of thing we can count
> on.

Yes, absolutely, any major change in the names RZ operations needs to have input from numbers and the IETF. I have no problem with broader inclusion within the committee.  I do, however, want to see the remit of this committee clearly restricted to the names. It seemed to me from the initial reading that there was still confusion about this (and these concerns were amply borne out).

--MM