[CWG-Stewardship] RZERC Charter for CWG review

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:12:58PM +0000, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> 
> The CWG represented only the names community, its proposal emerged out of the names community, and it only had authority to make proposals relevant to the names community. If you are talking about RZERC you are talking about names-related changes. 
> 

I think Milton is quite correct.  Bluntly, if _today_ the NTIA decided
to tell ICANN not to do something that the IETF specified under
ICANN's IANA agreement, I am quite sure that the IETF would use the
same 6 month notice period it would use after the transition.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com