[CWG-Stewardship] CSC Materials

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi Donna,

>From your proposed text, is there a reason why the second phase is not
maintained as RySG?

As to the representation, yeah having SO/AC provide an alternate to each of
their seat could work. At the same time, it could be difficult for some
SO/AC to get two good people that wish to volunteer. However I guess it's
fine to give it a try (I expect the process can be reviewed by members in a
flexible manner)

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 26 May 2016 6:10 p.m., "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz> wrote:

> Hi Seun
>
>
>
> In response to your suggestion and question, I propose that the text in
> question be removed and replace with the following:
>
>
>
> *The Membership Selection Process of the CSC Charter calls for due
> consideration to be given, to the extent possible, to form a CSC that has
> diversity in terms of geography and skill set. To that end the composition
> of the slate will be reviewed during two points in the selection process:
> firstly by the RySG and ccNSO and secondly by the ccNSO and GNSO. *
>
>
>
> To your point about candidates being rejected: this is not the intention.
> However, given that each SO/AC will be nominating candidates individually
> there is a possibility that the full slate could be without diversity in
> terms of skill set and geography, so a step has been built into the process
> to address this situation should it eventuate. It is also recommended that
> each SO/AC provide a preferred and secondary candidate for consideration.
>
>
>
> I hope this response addresses your concerns.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Donna
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Seun Ojedeji
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:07 AM
> *To:* Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CSC Materials
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Just a quick one on the diversity:
>
> Unless the applicant pool does not allow, candidates should not all come
> from the same
>
> geographical region (Europe; Asia/Australia/Pacific; Latin
> America/Caribbean islands; Africa;
>
> and North America), or be of the same gender.
>
> SO: While the above is practical with representative that have more than
> one member, i don't think it applies to all. So i suggest rewording as "Unless
> the applicant pool *and open seat* does not allow..."
>
>
> It should be noted that when approving the final composition of the CSC
> membership, which includes members and liaisons, the ccNSO and GNSO
> Councils will consider diversity in making their determination.
>
> SO: Does the last sentence imply that nominations from other members can
> be rejected by the DUO and that it can be rejected on grounds of diversity
> as well? So the DUO can say because we already have many female in the CSC
> we don't accept the single female nomination made by ALAC. I don't think
> that should be the intent at all.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Please see attached for a draft request for appointment of members and
> liaisons to the CSC.
>
>
>
> Supporting documents to this request is also attached i.e. as follows:
>
> -        CSC candidates qualification requirements and
>
> -        CSC scope and responsibilities.
>
>
>
> These materials have been developed by ICANN staff in collaboration with
> Donna Austin and Katrina Sataki, then subsequently reviewed by the IOTF
> group.
>
>
>
> If you have any concerns or suggested amendments, please do provide them
> as a matter of urgency and, in any event, no later than 16h00 UTC on Friday
> 26/05/2016.
>
>
>
> Thank-you for your consideration.
>
>
>
>
>
> Lise and Jonathan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_cwg-2Dstewardship&d=DQMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=DciiyvwMaH5uUZoJUZm3j6xCf2ayFPcDFYFyFsGvSec&s=x_FnrDQseh8QC2h6YTY7zb4cVQDo_pcfs26tCilVQQk&e=>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji, Federal University Oye-Ekiti web:      *
> *http://www.fuoye.edu.ng*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fuoye.edu.ng&d=DQMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=DciiyvwMaH5uUZoJUZm3j6xCf2ayFPcDFYFyFsGvSec&s=oF_6nlKffyTjkPc7UQiPFraonnSN2me_MTrhaAuOpJ8&e=>
> *Mobile: +2348035233535 <%2B2348035233535>*
> *alt email:*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goog-5F1872880453&d=DQMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=DciiyvwMaH5uUZoJUZm3j6xCf2ayFPcDFYFyFsGvSec&s=KvNCkPSDGxFsBTSE4AUz5nbDfep37H3_pJUpcyul0cc&e=>
> *seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng* <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>
>
> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160527/4d1ba908/attachment.html>