[CWG-Stewardship] CSC Materials

Tue May 31 19:35:04 UTC 2016

Hi Seun,

I think Donna's memory is good.  There might have been some need for equivalence - that the CSC is an instrument of the Councils as representatives of the customers, which automatically is the case for the ccNSO.  You will note that escalation goes through the Councils, so I think that also is a good reason for appointments to be made by the Councils.

Hope this helps

Martin

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Austin, Donna
Sent: 31 May 2016 19:54
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CSC Materials

Hi Seun

Sorry for the delay in responding.

To be honest I can't recall exactly the reasoning (maybe Martin does), but I think it was a recognition that the overall slate needed approval beyond the RySG, and we felt it more appropriate that this be done by both the GNSO and ccNSO Councils.

It's important to remember that the Liaison positions are not mandatory, with the exception of the Liaison to be provided by IANA. So, each SO/AC is not obligated to provide candidates.

The CSC Charter will be reviewed after the CSC has been in operation for 12 months so it is possible that the selection process could be revisited at that time.

Thanks

Donna

From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 10:54 PM
To: Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz<mailto:Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>>
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>; trang.nguyen at icann.org<mailto:trang.nguyen at icann.org>; Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] CSC Materials

Hi Donna,

>From your proposed text, is there a reason why the second phase is not maintained as RySG?

As to the representation, yeah having SO/AC provide an alternate to each of their seat could work. At the same time, it could be difficult for some SO/AC to get two good people that wish to volunteer. However I guess it's fine to give it a try (I expect the process can be reviewed by members in a flexible manner)

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 26 May 2016 6:10 p.m., "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz<mailto:Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>> wrote:
Hi Seun

In response to your suggestion and question, I propose that the text in question be removed and replace with the following:

The Membership Selection Process of the CSC Charter calls for due consideration to be given, to the extent possible, to form a CSC that has diversity in terms of geography and skill set. To that end the composition of the slate will be reviewed during two points in the selection process: firstly by the RySG and ccNSO and secondly by the ccNSO and GNSO.

To your point about candidates being rejected: this is not the intention. However, given that each SO/AC will be nominating candidates individually there is a possibility that the full slate could be without diversity in terms of skill set and geography, so a step has been built into the process to address this situation should it eventuate. It is also recommended that each SO/AC provide a preferred and secondary candidate for consideration.

I hope this response addresses your concerns.

Thanks

Donna

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Seun Ojedeji
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:07 AM
To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CSC Materials

Hello,
Just a quick one on the diversity:

Unless the applicant pool does not allow, candidates should not all come from the same

geographical region (Europe; Asia/Australia/Pacific; Latin America/Caribbean islands; Africa;

and North America), or be of the same gender.
SO: While the above is practical with representative that have more than one member, i don't think it applies to all. So i suggest rewording as "Unless the applicant pool and open seat does not allow..."

It should be noted that when approving the final composition of the CSC membership, which includes members and liaisons, the ccNSO and GNSO Councils will consider diversity in making their determination.
SO: Does the last sentence imply that nominations from other members can be rejected by the DUO and that it can be rejected on grounds of diversity as well? So the DUO can say because we already have many female in the CSC we don't accept the single female nomination made by ALAC. I don't think that should be the intent at all.
Regards

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>> wrote:
All,

Please see attached for a draft request for appointment of members and liaisons to the CSC.

Supporting documents to this request is also attached i.e. as follows:

-        CSC candidates qualification requirements and

-        CSC scope and responsibilities.

These materials have been developed by ICANN staff in collaboration with Donna Austin and Katrina Sataki, then subsequently reviewed by the IOTF group.

If you have any concerns or suggested amendments, please do provide them as a matter of urgency and, in any event, no later than 16h00 UTC on Friday 26/05/2016.

Thank-you for your consideration.

Lise and Jonathan

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_cwg-2Dstewardship&d=DQMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=DciiyvwMaH5uUZoJUZm3j6xCf2ayFPcDFYFyFsGvSec&s=x_FnrDQseh8QC2h6YTY7zb4cVQDo_pcfs26tCilVQQk&e=>

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fuoye.edu.ng&d=DQMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=DciiyvwMaH5uUZoJUZm3j6xCf2ayFPcDFYFyFsGvSec&s=oF_6nlKffyTjkPc7UQiPFraonnSN2me_MTrhaAuOpJ8&e=>
Mobile: +2348035233535<tel:%2B2348035233535>
alt email: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goog-5F1872880453&d=DQMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=DciiyvwMaH5uUZoJUZm3j6xCf2ayFPcDFYFyFsGvSec&s=KvNCkPSDGxFsBTSE4AUz5nbDfep37H3_pJUpcyul0cc&e=> seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng<mailto:seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>
Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160531/bdf3ee46/attachment-0001.html>