[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript for CWG IANA Meeting ##90 - 1 September
Brenda Brewer
brenda.brewer at icann.org
Fri Sep 2 19:21:39 UTC 2016
Dear all,
The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting #90 on 1 September 2016 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/9hOsAw
A copy of the notes and action items may be found below.
Kind regards,
Brenda
Action Items
* ACTION (ICANN Legal / Sidley): provide CWG with a revised version of the Naming functions agreement including today's points
before next CWG call.
* Suggestion is to submit redlined version as CWG's comment to the Public Comment after next call (Sept 08)
* ACTION (Sidley): propose some revised language on the basis of the feedback received by the group today.
* ACTION (staff): forward CWG invitation to Sidley.
Notes
1. Status Update (Chairs)
* Sidley working directly with ICANN Legal on the Naming functions agreement
* Key objective for today's call is to resolve remaining issues with the Naming functions agreement, and the IANA IPR
agreement (signatory and CCG representatives)
2. Implementation Update (Trang)
* Status update slide presented by Trang
3. Key Issues
3.1. Naming Functions Agreement
* Walk-thru Issues list produced by Sidley
* A1: no objections, considered closed
* A2: no objections, considered closed
* A3: alternative language has been proposed by Becky Burr, and further alternative language by Chuck/Milton. Proposed revised
wording should include changing "apply" to "consult". Group adopts revised wording.
ACTION (ICANN Legal): conform other sections of the agreement that have the same language
* A4: no objections, considered closed
* A5: no objections, considered closed
* A6: no objections, considered closed
* A7: discussed the role of the ombudsman as described in the CWG proposal. Group is ok with suppressing the Ombudsman
from Phase 2 (no changes to 8.1.b needed). Considered closed.
* A8: no objections, considered closed
* A9: no objections, considered closed
* A10: no objections, considered closed
ACTION (ICANN Legal / Sidley): provide CWG with a revised version of the Naming functions agreement including today's points
before next CWG call.
* Suggestion is to submit redlined version as CWG's comment to the Public Comment after next call (Sept 08)
3.2 IANA IPR
* Reviewed letter of instruction drafted by Sidley, designating ICANN as counterparty representing the Naming community for
signature of the Community agreement.
* Remaining open issues: definition of the Names Community, and designation of CCG representatives.
* Definition of the Names community: Greg Shatan provided a summary of the discussion initiated in the mailing list.
* Suggestion to nominate initial CCGs from the CWG
* Suggestion to have CWG act on this as long as it exists, then possibly the EC.
* Suggestion to fill in the blank in the letter by "CWG on behalf of the chartering organizations".
* Several objections to designating the CSC.
* Suggestion to use PTI board.
* Suggestion to use SO/ACs . Which ones? - the chartering organizations, potentially represented by their chairs.
ACTION (Sidley): propose some revised language on the basis of the feedback received by the group today.
* CCGs need to be selected by September 30th.
5. AOB
* Next CWG call: 08 Sep 16 @14:00 UTC.
ACTION (staff): forward CWG invitation to Sidley.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160902/d9d72554/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160902/d9d72554/image001-0001.gif>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list