[CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
Jonathan Robinson
jrobinson at afilias.info
Sat Sep 10 14:51:31 UTC 2016
Seun,
Please note that the drafting of the letter of appointment (as per the action you refer to) does not in any way pre-suppose the names of the actual appointees.
As the call records will show, I put a strawman out for the IANA IPR Group as the initial appointees for the CCG reps; 2 x Co-chairs (of CWG) plus Greg Shatan (as CCG Co-Chair).
Any other suggestions / proposals are clearly very welcome.
Jonathan
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
Sent: 10 September 2016 13:51
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>; Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
Seun,
Note that it was suggested that Greg Shatan serve as one of the interim CCG members; if we do that, it clearly would satisfy your recommendation that “a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency”.
Chuck
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Seun Ojedeji
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:46 AM
To: Brenda Brewer
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org <mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org> > wrote:
> Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
> Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.
>
SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make decisions based on their approval.
> ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a letter of appointment of CCG reps.
>
SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case, I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency.
On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members.
Regards
> 5. AOB
>
> IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
>
> ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
>
> Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org <mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160910/7632098c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list