<p dir="ltr">Chuck. That's correct. Jonathan</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 20 Oct 2014 22:38, "Gomes, Chuck" <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Jaap,<br>
<br>
I am sure that Grace or Marika will clarify this but my understanding is that the Wednesday call this week was scheduled before the biweekly Thursday meetings were decided and this week's call will still be on Wednesday to minimize confusion.<br>
<br>
Chuck<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Jaap Akkerhuis [mailto:<a href="mailto:jaap@bela.nlnetlabs.nl">jaap@bela.nlnetlabs.nl</a>]<br>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 5:32 PM<br>
To: Gomes, Chuck<br>
Cc: Grace Abuhamad; <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Scheduling: regular teleconference meetings + F2F in November<br>
<br>
"Gomes, Chuck" writes:<br>
<br>
><br>
> Thanks Grace. Is it correct to assume that the teleconference call on Thursday, October 30th will be at 10:00 UTC?<br>
<br>
So the announced call:<br>
<br>
The 3rd meeting of the CWG is scheduled for Wednesday 22<br>
October 2014 from 13:00-15:00 UTC.<br>
<br>
is an exeption on the Thursday rule or just a mistake and 23th October was meant?<br>
<br>
jaap<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
</blockquote></div>