<html>
<body>
At 01/12/2014 06:03 PM, Avri Doria wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font color="#330033">On
01-Dec-14 19:22, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
</font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<dl>
<dd>I fail to understand to how it can take action on problems if it is
not an ongoing entity.<br><br>
</dl><br>
GS: I think that it is fairly clear that the PRT has to be in a
state of readiness in order to deal with "non-periodic" events.
On the other hand, we don't want the PRT to feel the need to justify its
existence or fill monthly meeting agendas or expand its scope.
These can be controlled by the PRT's organizing documents (perhaps a
charter).</blockquote><br>
I very much agree with the sentiment.<br><br>
While I beleive that it can be called into service rather quickly,
look at how quickly the ICG was constituted, this does not not need to be
a deal killer. There could be condition put in its charter that
restricts the ability of the MRT to give itself further powers or
scope, with clauses saying that while it is constituted on, lets say, a
yearly basis and on call should the CSC raise an alert, it does not meet
unless it is there is an issue. <br><br>
avri</blockquote><br>
I guess "quickly", like many things, is in the eye of the
beholder. A group that exists but does not meet is fine with me. My
personal recommendation would be to have it schedule meetings and then
cancel if there is nothing on the agenda, but that is fine
tuning.<br><br>
Alan</body>
</html>