<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01-Dec-14 19:22, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+aOHURAPV4S-3K5OMH2XzBohTD6HcFUPL=KFk60p1QZ9CE0og@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div> I fail to understand to how it
can take action on problems if it is not an ongoing entity.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>GS: I think that it is fairly clear that the PRT has to be
in a state of readiness in order to deal with "non-periodic"
events. On the other hand, we don't want the PRT to feel the
need to justify its existence or fill monthly meeting agendas or
expand its scope. These can be controlled by the PRT's
organizing documents (perhaps a charter).</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I very much agree with the sentiment.<br>
<br>
While I beleive that it can be called into service rather quickly,
look at how quickly the ICG was constituted, this does not not need
to be a deal killer. There could be condition put in its charter
that restricts the ability of the MRT to give itself further powers
or scope, with clauses saying that while it is constituted on, lets
say, a yearly basis and on call should the CSC raise an alert, it
does not meet unless it is there is an issue. <br>
<br>
avri<br>
</body>
</html>