<div dir="ltr">We probably do have better things to discuss.... :-)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank">ocl@gih.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello all,<br>
<span class=""><br>
On 03/12/2014 22:10, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
> The objection was made only to releasing those "captured" comments in<br>
> a "daily log" format, out of concern we would give inappropriate<br>
> weight to these early comments versus comments that come later in the<br>
> process.<br>
<br>
</span>I really do not know why we are fussing about this. Seriously?<br>
I find Bernard Turcotte's daily summary helpful and I will give weight<br>
to early or late comments as I wish. As for the group itself giving<br>
equal weight to all comments, this is a given. That's how all public<br>
comments are analysed in ICANN. Thanks Bernard!<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>