<html>
<body>
Balanced MS representation is essential. Although the MRT is not a policy
setting body, it IS a policy enforcing body and as such, it needs
balanced representation. Alan<br><br>
At 17/12/2014 09:04 AM, Lindeberg, Elise wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Dear all, <br>
<br>
I agree with the comments from Milton, Lise and Dona on a flexible
solution and avoiding swelling out of proportions - but I don’t
see an argument for registries (ccs and gs) having greater rather than
equal representation on the MRT. The CWG is working on the basis of a
model with a distinction between the <u>Customer Standing Committee
(CSC)</u> - who will evaluating IANA reports and performance of the
IANA function for the community at large, based on a direct customer
relationship and the <b><u>Multistakeholder</b> Review team (MRT),</u>
who need to be <b>real Multistakeholder</b> with en equally balanced
representation from the community at large. Operational stability,
reliability of the IANA service and the actual placing of the IANA
function is of the outmost importance for the whole community.<br>
<br>
Best<br>
<br>
Elise</blockquote></body>
</html>