<html>
<body>
I must say that I find this level of bureaucracy totally unreasonable.
This is not someone from outside the organization trying to get ICANN to
reveal some secret, it is a properly chartered ICANN CWG trying to
understand its task mandated by the Board. <br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 22/12/2014 09:49 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hi James, <br>
I understand that there is a tight timeline, but the person seeking the
information should submit the request, not staff. <br>
--Grace<br><br>
From: James Gannon
<<a href="mailto:james@cyberinvasion.net">james@cyberinvasion.net</a>
><br>
Date: Monday, December 22, 2014 4:08 AM<br>
To: Grace Abuhamad
<<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>
>, "Gomes, Chuck"
<<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>>,
Alan Greenberg
<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
>, Guru Acharya
<<a href="mailto:gurcharya@gmail.com">gurcharya@gmail.com</a>>,
Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>><br>
Cc:
"<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br>
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT<br><br>
Hi Grace,<br>
<br>
Given the tight timelines involved here could a member of staff
manage/expedite a response on behalf of the chairs/CWG?<br>
<br>
<b>From:</b>
<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" eudora="autourl">
mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Grace
Abuhamad<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, December 22, 2014 5:51 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck; Alan Greenberg; Guru Acharya; Avri Doria<br>
<b>Cc:</b>
<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>
<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT<br>
<br>
Dear all, <br>
For a more fulsome response to your questions on obtaining the
Contingency Plan, please submit a request through ICANN’s Documentary
Information Disclosure Policy, available at
<a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/didp-2012-02-25-en">
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/didp-2012-02-25-en</a>.<br>
<br>
<b>From: </b><Gomes>, Chuck
<<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:55 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>Alan Greenberg
<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
>, Grace Abuhamad
<<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>
>, Guru Acharya
<<a href="mailto:gurcharya@gmail.com">gurcharya@gmail.com</a>>,
Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>><br>
<b>Cc:
</b>"<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT<br>
<br>
At a minimum, we should ask what needs to be done to allow some review of
it.<br>
<br>
Chuck<br>
<br>
<b>From:</b><a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">
mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Alan
Greenberg<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:08 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Grace Abuhamad; Guru Acharya; Avri Doria<br>
<b>Cc:</b>
<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>
<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT<br>
<br>
I believe that any such document must be shared with the CWG, if only
with the Co-Chairs or some specific sub-set of the CWG who of course must
sign an appropriate confidentiality document and perhaps get clearance
for what they share (with an appeal process in the case of a
disagreement).<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 17/12/2014 10:46 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
Hi all, <br><br>
We looked into this and noted that the Continuity & Contingency Plan
is confidential and cannot be distributed. <br><br>
Notes, transcripts, and recordings for RFP4 call are available here:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/MYcQAw">
https://community.icann.org/x/MYcQAw</a> <br>
<b><br>
</b>Best, <br>
Grace<br><br>
From: Guru Acharya
<<a href="mailto:gurcharya@gmail.com">gurcharya@gmail.com</a>><br>
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:05 AM<br>
To: Avri Doria
<<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>><br>
Cc: "<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT<br><br>
Hi Avri,<br><br>
This was an action item for the staff from the call on 25th November. I
believe they have already put in a request for the document with the IANA
staff. Maybe Grace or Marika can update us on the request.<br><br>
"<b>ACTION staff : Ask IANA staff to share details on 7.3 that might
be available for the public and/or online</b>"<br>
On 17 Dec 2014 17:29, "Avri Doria"
<<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
Hi,<br>
Is that 'transition to a "successor contractor" plan'
available to the CWG?<br>
avri<br>
On 17-Dec-14 05:26, Matthew Shears wrote:<br><br>
<br>
Alan <br>
Section C.7 in the current contract addresses issues of continuity of
operations - particularly C.7.3, according to which ICANN should have a
transition to a "successor <br>
contractor" plan in place at the moment <br>
Matthew <br>
On 12/17/2014 3:38 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote: <br><br>
<br>
As someone whose ICANN 'job" is supporting/defending the needs of
Internet users, I will point out that security and stability of the IANA
functions is of paramount importance for the ALAC as well. <br>
I look forward to the seeing how that can be assured in a potentially
disruptive switch of the IANA operator where it may be that there is no
continuity of either staff or systems. <br>
Alan <br>
At 15/12/2014 03:16 PM, Donna Austin wrote: <br><br>
<br><br>
All <br>
I largely agree with Christopher. I think we are creating complexity
where it does not necessarily need to be, but as we are here I want to
reiterate a few comments I made on the RFP 3 call earlier today, and
these comments come from a gTLD registry operator perspective: <br>
· Operational stability
and reliability of the IANA service is imperative to the business
operations of registry operators and as such this should be a critical
consideration in any discussions. <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a>
<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a>
<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a>
<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
</blockquote></body>
</html>