<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
    Hi,<br>
    <br>
    thanks.  <br>
    numbers to stare at for a while.<br>
    <br>
    Interesting bottom line:<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <table style="border-collapse: collapse;" border="0"
        cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="142" width="642">
        <colgroup><col
            style="mso-width-source:userset;mso-width-alt:5522;width:113pt"
            width="151"></colgroup><tbody>
          <tr style="height:12.75pt" height="17">
            <td class="xl63" style="height:12.75pt;width:113pt"
              height="17" width="151">Conclusions - The only thing these
              3 groups have in common is that the proposal is too
              complex, that IANA should not be shifted from ICANN at the
              beginning of the transition and that accountability needs
              to be in place prior to the transition.</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06-Jan-15 14:27, Bernard Turcotte
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAPhodgJPE3y2Uk+C4kswepE8Any5ziObkoZM6ggBtvVBXJGUwg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default">
          <div class="gmail_default">All (at the request of the
            co-Chairs),</div>
          <div class="gmail_default"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default">Please find attached  the next
            version (2.0) of the analysis (based on the previous
            spreadsheet which was presented on December 30th).</div>
          <div class="gmail_default"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default">All the data used is included as
            well as how it was classified etc. and the various tabs are
            aptly named.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default">Tabulation of results has now been
            automated to avoid errors.</div>
          <div class="gmail_default"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default">There are no significant
            differences vs the results presented December 30th:</div>
          <div class="gmail_default"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_default">
            <ul>
              <li>The analysis of all the responses together is
                essentially the same and still does not give a majority
                to Contract Co.(when using a 75% requirement)</li>
              <li>The analysis by type of respondent is useful but the
                cross comparisons are not, at least in my opinion.</li>
              <li>The analysis of ccTLDs vs the RySG proposal in
                interesting.</li>
              <li>The analysis of In ICANN vs Not In ICANN is very
                interesting with a high degree of correlation on many
                points by those In ICANN.</li>
            </ul>
            <div>Attached.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>B.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>