<html>
<body>
Maarten, I don't think you are over-simplifying, but then, that has been
my position from the start.<br><br>
RFP3B is charged with presenting such a solution to the overall CWG, but
so far we seem to be having a hard time really getting going.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 26/01/2015 04:18 AM, Maarten Simon wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">All,<br><br>
I have read the CCWG-Accountability Chairs’ statement and wonder if we
should not also discuss a scenario for the situation where the
CCWG-Accountability will be successful in reaching their first
requirement:<br><br>
<font face="helvetica">“</font><font face="Helvetica, Helvetica"><b><i><u>
Enabling community empowerment over ICANN Board decisions with limited,
strictly enumerated, last resort powers;"<br>
</u></i></b></font><br>
As far as I understand, these last resort powers are meant to include the
powers with regard to the IANA functions. I figure that if the community
will already have the final say over the IANA functions through these
last resort powers, that:<br><br>
1. There will be no need for an external solution where the same
community will be given the final say over the IANA functions;<br><br>
2. There is no need for an MRT;<br><br>
3. There might be a need for a CSC (maybe a CSC plus);<br><br>
But maybe I am oversimplifying things here ?<br><br>
Best,<br><br>
Maarten<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a></blockquote>
</body>
</html>