<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Agree with Avri and Elise.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/2/2015 10:02 AM, Lindeberg, Elise
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:B4915FBB4752F444A03D0CB18D1EA69CA4A321CC@exmbx01"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:8.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;
line-height:106%;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
p.MsoFootnoteText, li.MsoFootnoteText, div.MsoFootnoteText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Fotnotetekst Tegn";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML-forhåndsformatert Tegn";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:#330033;}
span.FotnotetekstTegn
{mso-style-name:"Fotnotetekst Tegn";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:Fotnotetekst;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
p.FootnoteText, li.FootnoteText, div.FootnoteText
{mso-style-name:"Footnote Text";
mso-style-link:"Footnote Text Char";
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:8.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;
line-height:106%;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
span.FootnoteTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Footnote Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Footnote Text";}
p.CWGfootnote, li.CWGfootnote, div.CWGfootnote
{mso-style-name:"CWG footnote";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
span.HTML-forhndsformatertTegn
{mso-style-name:"HTML-forhåndsformatert Tegn";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:HTML-forhåndsformatert;
font-family:Consolas;
color:#330033;}
span.EpostStil25
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I agree with Avri on
this - the notion of separability has to be underlined as
common to both models.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">And, since this is a key
element in the CWG discussions, principles and draft
solutions , I think we should formulate a question to the
community about the importance of separability, that is if
an all internal solution creates enough separation and
independent oversight and review. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Elise<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">Fra:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>På vegne av</b> Avri Doria<br>
<b>Sendt:</b> 2. februar 2015 09:21<br>
<b>Til:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Emne:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Draft Report
for Singapore<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;line-height:normal"><span
lang="EN-CA">Hi,<br>
<br>
One to the comments I would make is that the notion of
separability, the ability to remove the IANA function from
ICANN without necessarily separating the function from ICANN
at this time, is common to both solutions as it is contained
in the principles and both solutions allow for this, though
in a different manner (contract co vs. so-called nuclear
options). I beleive it should get a point in the "
<b>Common points between the two models</b> " </span><span
style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif""><br>
<br>
avri<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif"">On 02-Feb-15 07:47, Avri
Doria wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>