<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:8.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;
line-height:106%;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
p.MsoFootnoteText, li.MsoFootnoteText, div.MsoFootnoteText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Fotnotetekst Tegn";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML-forhåndsformatert Tegn";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:#330033;}
span.FotnotetekstTegn
{mso-style-name:"Fotnotetekst Tegn";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:Fotnotetekst;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
p.FootnoteText, li.FootnoteText, div.FootnoteText
{mso-style-name:"Footnote Text";
mso-style-link:"Footnote Text Char";
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:8.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;
line-height:106%;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
span.FootnoteTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Footnote Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Footnote Text";}
p.CWGfootnote, li.CWGfootnote, div.CWGfootnote
{mso-style-name:"CWG footnote";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#330033;}
span.HTML-forhndsformatertTegn
{mso-style-name:"HTML-forhåndsformatert Tegn";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:HTML-forhåndsformatert;
font-family:Consolas;
color:#330033;}
span.EpostStil25
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="NO-BOK" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I agree with Avri on this - the notion of separability has to be underlined as common to both models.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">And, since this is a key element in the CWG discussions, principles and draft solutions , I think we should formulate a question to the community about the importance of separability, that is if an all internal solution
creates enough separation and independent oversight and review. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Elise<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">Fra:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
<b>På vegne av</b> Avri Doria<br>
<b>Sendt:</b> 2. februar 2015 09:21<br>
<b>Til:</b> cwg-stewardship@icann.org<br>
<b>Emne:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Draft Report for Singapore<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;line-height:normal"><span lang="EN-CA">Hi,<br>
<br>
One to the comments I would make is that the notion of separability, the ability to remove the IANA function from ICANN without necessarily separating the function from ICANN at this time, is common to both solutions as it is contained in the principles and
both solutions allow for this, though in a different manner (contract co vs. so-called nuclear options). I beleive it should get a point in the "
<b>Common points between the two models</b> " </span><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><br>
<br>
avri<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">On 02-Feb-15 07:47, Avri Doria wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Hi,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">On 02-Feb-15 00:07, Milton L Mueller wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA">The first point you make in this report, which apparently was drafted by ICANN staff, is “Overall there was very strong support for the current IANA operator (ICANN) and that the IANA functions should not be moved from
ICANN, or tendered for, at the onset of the transition.” Taken out of context, this statement makes it seem as if there is little support for separability.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><br>
And yet what is says appears true as it stands, no mater who wrote it.<br>
<br>
I think the misapprehension some might get could be fixed by adding a clause at the begining that says While separability has been supported as a basic principle of the process, and is supported by a most of the participants, overal there is ....<br>
<br>
I was traveling when this came out am still reading the report and will add my personal views on the report later in the day. At this point I should emphasise that these reviews will all be personal and will not be an NCSG position - I do not think we have
time to reach such a consensus even among the our smaller tracking group in the next day. If perchance we do, I will inform the list of that condition.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>