<html>
<body>
No problem with this. Alan<br><br>
At 02/02/2015 03:20 AM, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hi,<br>
<font color="#330033"><br>
One to the comments I would make is that the notion of separability, the
ability to remove the IANA function from ICANN without necessarily
separating the function from ICANN at this time, is common to both
solutions as it is contained in the principles and both solutions allow
for this, though in a different manner (contract co vs. so-called nuclear
options). I beleive it should get a point in the " <b>Common
points between the two models</b> " <br><br>
avri<br><br>
On 02-Feb-15 07:47, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hi,<br><br>
On 02-Feb-15 00:07, Milton L Mueller wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><br>
The first point you make in this report, which apparently was drafted by
ICANN staff, is “Overall there was very strong support for the current
IANA operator (ICANN) and that the IANA functions should not be moved
from ICANN, or tendered for, at the onset of the transition.” Taken out
of context, this statement makes it seem as if there is little support
for separability. </blockquote><br>
And yet what is says appears true as it stands, no mater who wrote
it.<br><br>
I think the misapprehension some might get could be fixed by adding a
clause at the begining that says While separability has been supported as
a basic principle of the process, and is supported by a most of the
participants, overal there is ....<br><br>
I was traveling when this came out am still reading the report and will
add my personal views on the report later in the day. At this point
I should emphasise that these reviews will all be personal and will not
be an NCSG position - I do not think we have time to reach such a
consensus even among the our smaller tracking group in the next
day. If perchance we do, I will inform the list of that
condition.<br><br>
avri<br><br>
<br>
avri<br><br>
<br><br>
</font><pre>_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a>
</pre><font color="#330033"></blockquote><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" eudora="autourl">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a></font>
</blockquote></body>
</html>