<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I think the point is that Names provides most of the income for
ICANN and thus for IANA.<br>
<br>
I think it is quite appropriate for names to know how much goes into
supporting Protocols and Numbers - especially in a word where we are
told by the ICG that they are operationally separate and equal.
Perhaps others think so too. I think it is a very appropriate
question while we are thinking about transition and the reliability
of the funding for the future. and I do think the long term funding
is a part of the model we have not paid great attention to.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03-Feb-15 07:27, Seun Ojedeji wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD_dc6h7u-2n54SnOgjkC7PXfkNcCbzDFiyhrE0cHHEG-F-vgQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p dir="ltr">sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.<br>
On 3 Feb 2015 02:35, "Gomes, Chuck" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Thanks Bernie.<br>
><br>
> · Regarding “Are your concerned about the actual
costs for operating the IANA functions, for protocols and
numbers, given these are currently funded by ICANN.” – Are don’t
think it is accurate to say that they are currently funded by
ICANN; ICANN may fund some costs but a large part of the RIR and
IETF functions are not funded by ICANN.<br>
><br>
While the RIRs contributes $800k+ annually (there is no clear
financial contribution made by the IETF body), it's not clear
how much is spent to operate numbers functions for instance. So
I think the intent of the question could be to understand
whether the community is interested in knowing the actual cost
of operating the respective functions since everything seem
lumped together at the moment. <br>
Whether it's appropriate for the CWG to ask would be another
thing to consider, so perhaps rephrasing the question to refer
to names related function may be helpful. Something similar to
below:</p>
<p dir="ltr">" Given that the proposal from respective communities
may be different, are you concerned about knowing the actual
costs for operating the IANA functions related to names"</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards<br>
> <br>
><br>
> Chuck<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> From: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>
[mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte<br>
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 8:13 PM<br>
> To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - DRAFT discussion document
for Singapore V3.5<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> All,<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> At the request of Lise and Jonathan, given the time-frame
is incredibly short, I am including version 3.5 of the
discussion document.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Based on 3.2 all changes are in track changes and each
change has been attribute via a comment bubble to the person or
persons who made the original comment/request.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> We have also included the questions which were suggested on
today's RFP3 call.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> As per Jonathan's request we do need to get this done
before heading to Singapore which for most of us will be mid-day
Wednesday of this week. As such we would appreciate any
significant comments by noon UTC of Wednesday this week at which
point we will finalize the document for general distribution.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Thank You.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> B.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Ps clean and track changes version included.<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
><br>
</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>