<div dir="ltr">Jonathan,<div><br></div><div>As I am sure you are aware, it is vitally important that every aspect of this transition process is seen to be done as openly and as transparently as possible.</div><div><br></div><div>The two chairs decided to step outside what have been the norms of this process - open groups, mailing lists and minuted discussions - in what is one of the most important aspects of this whole process: the selection of an independent legal expert.</div><div><br></div><div>The reason given for that significant change in approach - and the reason accepted by this group - was expediency: the ability to quickly choose a third party.</div><div><br></div><div>That claimed benefit, and the reasons for the trade-off in openness and transparency, has not happened as you yourself acknowledge. </div><div><br></div><div>At this point, it should have been clear to the committee that it needed to re-engender the trust put into it by the community by being as open and informative as possible. </div><div><br></div><div>As you can see from numerous posts to this thread, the update that was provided falls far short of what we would expect to see from a closed door process. </div><div><br></div><div>Now this is not to apportion blame - we are all extremely well aware of the enormous workload this group and the chairs in particular are under.</div><div><br></div><div>But "trust" - which is the remaining reason you provide for continuing to run a out-of-step process - is not something built up that can then be spent on bypassing procedural norms or failing to provide sufficient information. Trust in this context comes from you and the other members of the committee recognizing people's concerns and taking concrete steps to address them.</div><div><br></div><div>Now I have asked to join the committee and I am willing to bring my skills of quick, concise and accurate communication to fill the gap between running a closed process and keeping people informed and confident that the committee is working in the best overall interests of the group.</div><div><br></div><div>I would hope you will accept this offer, also given in good faith, or else give a very good reason why not. </div><div><br></div><div>As to confidentiality, that is an obvious and very simple issue to tackle. Although I would expect to see clear communication explaining why it is necessary to keep some details confidential and to outline in broad what details those are. That, I would argue, is how to best create trust in this unusual process.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Kieren</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Jonathan Robinson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info" target="_blank">jrobinson@afilias.info</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thanks Seun and others before you on this thread.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">We set up this client committee around a month ago comprising the two co-chairs plus two lawyers, one from cc community (Maarten), one from g community (Greg).<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The group is performing an unusual function and in defining the composition of the committee we sought to balance a number of factors including effectiveness of the group, expertise of the participants etc.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">A couple of key points emerge:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p><u></u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><span>1.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><u></u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">This could be done faster. Noted and we share your impatience. <br>There has been commitment to the work and it has simply taken some time to identify qualified firms, remove those with conflicts and then produce the short-list.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p><u></u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><span>2.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><u></u><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">This could be more transparent. Noted and I’m sure we can improve here. <br>There is an element of confidentiality in the selection process as was highlighted earlier in the thread.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Suggestions remain welcome at any time and both points above are clear but please note, and as highlighted by Olivier, a degree of trust is required here. We are working hard and in good faith.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Jonathan<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Seun Ojedeji [mailto:<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>] <br><b>Sent:</b> 25 February 2015 06:00<br><b>To:</b> Kurt Pritz<br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a></span></p><div><div class="h5"><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee Update<u></u><u></u></div></div><p></p><div><div class="h5"><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p>The way I understand it is that the 4 team members are volunteering (!paid), so I guess that payment part is mute. I think at this point, there is no need to increase the number, unless the client committee formerly indicate of their need for more people. What is just required is for the committee to document their activities transparently so we can follow them as I believe those will form part of the RFP response (rfp6 I think?- the one about community engagement)<u></u><u></u></p><p>Cheers!<br>sent from Google nexus 4<br>kindly excuse brevity and typos.<u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">On 25 Feb 2015 06:36, "Kurt Pritz" <<a href="mailto:kpritz@thedna.org" target="_blank">kpritz@thedna.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">Why not make Kieren the rapporteur? That would add transparency, take the reporting load off of the other participants, and he is a professional. He could be paid a fee by ICANN. <u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Kurt<u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Feb 24, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><br><br><u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">hi,<br><br>And for balance, if we add another non lawyer, perhaps we then also need to add another lawyer.<br><br>Personally i never understood before that it takes this long to find legal advice.<br><br>avri<u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">On 25-Feb-15 12:22, Milton L Mueller wrote:<u></u><u></u></p></div><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><p class="MsoNormal">Yes, maybe we could cool down some of the concerns if you just added Kieren and one other independent to it. <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">(I am NOT volunteering!)<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">--MM<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a name="14bbfff90ff7b7fd_14bbf3cf7ec42705__MailEndCompose"> </a><u></u><u></u></p><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Kieren McCarthy<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 24, 2015 6:56 PM<br><b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck<br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a> Stewardship<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee Update<u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">> How do we balance functionality and timely efficiency with allowing full openness to all?<u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">I don't see many others asking to join this committee so I'm not sure this question is valid.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">What I would be more concerned about is if the first proper decision made by this group is done within a small group that refused to allows others in, even when asked.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Kieren<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Kieren,<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">How do we balance functionality and timely efficiency with allowing full openness to all?<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Chuck<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone<u></u><u></u></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Kieren McCarthy <<a href="mailto:kierenmccarthy@gmail.com" target="_blank">kierenmccarthy@gmail.com</a>> <br>Date:02/24/2015 1:24 PM (GMT-05:00) <br>To: "Gomes, Chuck" <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Cc: Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>, "<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a> Stewardship" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>> <br>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee Update <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">So far with this transition process, every group has been open to all those who wish to join with an expectation of participation. <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">I would expect those same rules to apply here. <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">It strikes me that it would set a dangerous precedent if the chairs are allowed to create a closed group at any time.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Kieren<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">In my opinion, as soon as we open this up to others it will become too large to be effective in what I believe will need to be an interactive process with the legal team selected. I personally favor keeping it as is and require transparency and regular interaction by the 4 members with the CWG.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Chuck<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone<u></u><u></u></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> <br>Date:02/24/2015 1:01 PM (GMT-05:00) <br>To: Kieren McCarthy <<a href="mailto:kierenmccarthy@gmail.com" target="_blank">kierenmccarthy@gmail.com</a>> <br>Cc: "<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a> Stewardship" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>> <br>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee Update <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">I will leave this to our CWG chairs, who convened the committee. I am just a humble servant. <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Greg<u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Kieren McCarthy <<a href="mailto:kierenmccarthy@gmail.com" target="_blank">kierenmccarthy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><p class="MsoNormal">I'd be interested in joining this group, help contribute.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Can you advise how I join?<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Kieren<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><br>-<br>[sent through phone]<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><div><p>On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">The client committee is myself, Maarten Simon, Jonathan Robinson and Lise Fuhr. <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Greg Shatan<u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, CW Lists <<a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu" target="_blank">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><p class="MsoNormal">Who are the members of the Client Committee? <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">CW<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On 24 Feb 2015, at 06:33, Kieren McCarthy <<a href="mailto:kierenmccarthy@gmail.com" target="_blank">kierenmccarthy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Can I assume you will be posting the three remaining law firms responses to this list, albeit with identifying information removed?<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Kieren<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><br>-<br>[sent through phone]<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p>On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"><div><div><p class="MsoNormal">All:<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">I write to update you all on the activities of the Client Committee.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">The Client Committee met on Friday, February 20. Also attending were representatives of ICANN legal, since they will need to play a role in the selection and engagement of counsel.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">We had initially identified a total of eight firms. Each firm has appropriate expertise in corporate governance, non-profit matters, trusts, etc. Each firm also has a strong California presence, as well as other offices in the US and other countries. <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">One firm has withdrawn due to workload issues. Four firms have withdrawn due to client conflicts<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">We are left with a short list of three firms. Each of these firms has now sent us a document discussing their relevant capabilities. At least one member of the client committee has had a preliminary discussion with each firm. We are now in the process of setting up a series of follow-up calls for this week between the Client Committee and each firm.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">While we would like to reveal the names of the firms remaining on the short list, at this point, it is premature to do so. We will need to ask each firm permission to identify it to this group. We will discuss this with them during our calls this week.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">We will keep the CWG updated on our progress.<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal">Greg Shatan<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">for the Client Committee <u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Gregory S. Shatan ï Abelman Frayne & Schwab</b> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Partner | IP | Technology | Media | Internet</b> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621</b> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Direct</b> <a href="tel:212-885-9253" target="_blank">212-885-9253</a> <b>| Main</b> <a href="tel:212-949-9022" target="_blank">212-949-9022</a> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Fax</b> <a href="tel:212-949-9190" target="_blank">212-949-9190</a> <b>|</b> <b>Cell </b><a href="tel:917-816-6428" target="_blank">917-816-6428</a> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><a href="mailto:gsshatan@lawabel.com" target="_blank">gsshatan@lawabel.com</a></i></b> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>ICANN-related: <i><a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a></i></b> <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><a href="http://www.lawabel.com/" target="_blank">www.lawabel.com</a></i></b> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div><p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br><a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><u></u><u></u></p></blockquote></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></blockquote></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal">-- <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p><b>Gregory S. Shatan ï Abelman Frayne & Schwab</b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>Partner | IP | Technology | Media | Internet</b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621</b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>Direct</b> <a href="tel:212-885-9253" target="_blank">212-885-9253</a> <b>| Main</b> <a href="tel:212-949-9022" target="_blank">212-949-9022</a><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>Fax</b> <a href="tel:212-949-9190" target="_blank">212-949-9190</a> <b>|</b> <b>Cell </b><a href="tel:917-816-6428" target="_blank">917-816-6428</a><u></u><u></u></p><p><b><i><a href="mailto:gsshatan@lawabel.com" target="_blank">gsshatan@lawabel.com</a></i></b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>ICANN-related: <i><a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a></i></b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b><i><a href="http://www.lawabel.com/" target="_blank">www.lawabel.com</a></i></b><u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></blockquote></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal">-- <u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p><b>Gregory S. Shatan ï Abelman Frayne & Schwab</b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>Partner | IP | Technology | Media | Internet</b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621</b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>Direct</b> <a href="tel:212-885-9253" target="_blank">212-885-9253</a> <b>| Main</b> <a href="tel:212-949-9022" target="_blank">212-949-9022</a><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>Fax</b> <a href="tel:212-949-9190" target="_blank">212-949-9190</a> <b>|</b> <b>Cell </b><a href="tel:917-816-6428" target="_blank">917-816-6428</a><u></u><u></u></p><p><b><i><a href="mailto:gsshatan@lawabel.com" target="_blank">gsshatan@lawabel.com</a></i></b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b>ICANN-related: <i><a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a></i></b><u></u><u></u></p><p><b><i><a href="http://www.lawabel.com/" target="_blank">www.lawabel.com</a></i></b><u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><pre>_______________________________________________<u></u><u></u></pre><pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<u></u><u></u></pre><pre><a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><u></u><u></u></pre><pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><u></u><u></u></pre></blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br><a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><u></u><u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div></div></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>_______________________________________________<br>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br><a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>