<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Bobletekst Tegn";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EpostStil18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BobletekstTegn
{mso-style-name:"Bobletekst Tegn";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:Bobletekst;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EpostStil21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="NO-BOK" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">+1 Martin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Elise<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">Fra:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
<b>På vegne av</b> Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Sendt:</b> 4. mars 2015 13:19<br>
<b>Til:</b> Erick Iriarte<br>
<b>Kopi:</b> CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Emne:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thanks Erick,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">In essence you are proposing changing the words “policy authority” to “laws related to each ccTLD”.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I would have a concern with this in that .uk policy is developed through our own national process rooted in the local community and working in
a multi-stakeholder process (and the same is the case for many other ccTLDs). Our policies are not written in law, but are based on a national discussion leading to general consensus. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">What I like about the current formulation is that this policy authority cannot be overturned by a zealous Californian-based organisation with its
own idea of what is the right way to do things. Your wording would seem to open this as an option because our policies are not laws (although they would not conflict with the UK’s legal requirements).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’d welcome your thoughts, and any further explanation of your proposal. Could you see an alternative that ensured the safeguards that are in
the current text?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Erick Iriarte [<a href="mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com">mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 04 March 2015 11:38<br>
<b>To:</b> Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Cc:</b> CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">HI Martin, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB">I have reviewed your document and thank you for inviting comments on it.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">i would like to suggest a change in clause h.ii<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">"ii. For ccTLDs: the IANA Functions Operator should provide a service without requiring a contract and should respect the diversity of agreements and arrangements in place for ccTLDs. In particular, the nationals laws
related to each ccTLD should be respected and no additional requirements should be imposed unless they are directly and demonstrably linked to global security, stability, resilience of the DNS and existing registrants use of the ccTLD."<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Yours, Erick<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Erick<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">El 3/3/2015, a las 10:09, Martin Boyle <<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>> escribió:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Colleagues,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">My apologies, but following the Christmas break I failed to progress this discussion. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I now attach a revised draft, still with a major outstanding issue in g. (page 2). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">There are two variants for g.ii. One simply reduces the previous paragraph to read “For ccTLDs, respect national sovereignty;” at the request of the GAC. The
other is more closely based on, but shortens, the previous text: “For ccTLDs, policy decisions may be made locally through nationally agreed processes in accordance with national laws and in compliance with IETF technical standards. Post transition of the
IANA function nothing will be done by ICANN/IANA to impact the stable operation of ccTLD Registries and gTLD Registries.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">The draft contains a number of marked up edits from previous discussions that seem to have general agreement. For the text redlines:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">1.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I
have deleted the section heading “Introduction”: there are no other section headings, so this appears to be superfluous.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">2.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Principles
b. and c. (previously sub-clauses to the heading on security, stability and resilience) are now stand-alone at the request of the GAC.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">3.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Accountability
& transparency (e.):<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">a.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
i: two edits that appear to have general agreement.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">b.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
ii: a new edit to correct the text. The new version amends the text to reflect the sub-heading. The old version put it the other way around.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">c.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
iv: Footnote on capture added as requested courtesy of Alan Greenberg & Milton Mueller.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">d.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
vi: While I think we all agree on the need for some form of appeals process, there is still some debate as to where that should lie. So for example, the appeals process might well not be designed by the CWG and might be the responsibility of the CCWG. For
ccTLDs, it might mean that a third party might have a say over a national decision on a ccTLD. I flag this in case further thought is needed in the light of discussion over the last few days.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">4.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Service
levels (f.):<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">a.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
ii: I think the majority view is that automation should only be for routine functions (and not for controversial or subjective decisions such as on redelegations).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">b.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
iii: Previously a stand-alone point.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">5.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Policy
based (g): other than some minor editing, there are two alternatives for g.ii. as noted above. I would note that there was no support in our last discussion to retain g.vi. (require bottom-up modalities) as this is treated elsewhere (in particular in the
chapeau text to g.).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">6.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Diversity
of customers (h.): some (I hope) minor and uncontroversial edits in the chapeau and in i. and ii. The text in paragraph iii was generally agreed.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">7.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Separability:
modifications to i.i. and i.iii generally agreed in the last discussion.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">8.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Multi-stakeholder
principle paragraph j: generally agreed in the last discussion subject to concerns about wording (the previous text appeared to recommend direct involvement in the management of the IANA function).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><Draft of Principles - updated 3 March.docx></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
</span><span lang="EN-GB"><a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</span></a></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><br>
</span><span lang="EN-GB"><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>