<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Milton,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">I’m fine with this and generally agree with you point that models should be based on principles, not the other way around. But note that here we are talking about separation of policy from the IANA functions
operator (separability is dealt with later), which is required, should continue to be required and is a fundamental principle: IANA functions operator follows agreed policy.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Martin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller@syr.edu]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 04 March 2015 16:59<br>
<b>To:</b> Duchesneau, Stephanie; Martin Boyle; cwg-stewardship@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">Martin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:10.0pt;margin-left:45.0pt;text-indent:-9.0pt;line-height:115%">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:7.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span><span lang="EN-US">i.</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:7.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">I think you need to strike the part of e iii where you say “</span><span lang="EN-US">Note: this does not pre-suppose any model for separation of the policy and IANA roles. The current contract already requires
such separation);<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">First, the second sentence it is factually inaccurate, or at least contested, to say that the current contract requires it. As the results of the CWG survey show, the group has different views on
whether the current contract provides for adequate separation. Second, NO principle presupposes any model, indeed the models are supposed to conform to the principles, so making this disclaimer about one specific principle is tendentious.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D">--MM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"></a><span lang="EN-US" style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Duchesneau, Stephanie<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, March 3, 2015 2:15 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Martin Boyle'; <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="OLE_LINK2"></a><a name="OLE_LINK1"></a><span lang="EN-US">Hi Martin and all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br>
Here is my suggested language revision from today’s call.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br>
Stephanie<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:12.0pt"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#262626">Stephanie Duchesneau</span></b><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#3366FF">
<br>
</span></b><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#068658">Neustar, Inc. /
</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#7D7D7D">Public Policy Manager<br>
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4<sup>th</sup> Floor, Washington, DC 20006</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:gray"><br>
</span><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#068658">Office:</span></b><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#333333">
</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#7D7D7D">+1.202.533.2623
</span><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#068658">Mobile:
</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#7D7D7D">+1.703.731.2040</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:gray">
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#000066"> </span><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#068658">Fax:
</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#7D7D7D">+1.202.533.2623</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:gray">
</span><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#068658">/</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#068658">
</span><span lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.neustar.biz/"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#068658">www.neustar.biz</span></a></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:gray">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#7D7D7D">
<hr size="1" width="100%" noshade="" style="color:#969696" align="left">
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#7D7D7D">The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s)
named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#7D7D7D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:09 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Colleagues,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My apologies, but following the Christmas break I failed to progress this discussion.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I now attach a revised draft, still with a major outstanding issue in g. (page 2).
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are two variants for g.ii. One simply reduces the previous paragraph to read “For ccTLDs, respect national sovereignty;” at the request of the GAC. The other is more closely based on, but shortens, the previous text: “For ccTLDs,
policy decisions may be made locally through nationally agreed processes in accordance with national laws and in compliance with IETF technical standards. Post transition of the IANA function nothing will be done by ICANN/IANA to impact the stable operation
of ccTLD Registries and gTLD Registries.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The draft contains a number of marked up edits from previous discussions that seem to have general agreement. For the text redlines:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">1.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>I have deleted the section heading “Introduction”: there are no other section headings, so this appears to be superfluous.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">2.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Principles b. and c. (previously sub-clauses to the heading on security, stability and resilience) are now stand-alone at the request of the GAC.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">3.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Accountability & transparency (e.):<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">a.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Paragraph i: two edits that appear to have general agreement.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">b.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Paragraph ii: a new edit to correct the text. The new version amends the text to reflect the sub-heading. The old version put it the other way around.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">c.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Paragraph iv: Footnote on capture added as requested courtesy of Alan Greenberg & Milton Mueller.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">d.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Paragraph vi: While I think we all agree on the need for some form of appeals process, there is still some debate as to where that should lie. So for example, the appeals process might well not be designed by the CWG and might be the responsibility
of the CCWG. For ccTLDs, it might mean that a third party might have a say over a national decision on a ccTLD. I flag this in case further thought is needed in the light of discussion over the last few days.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">4.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Service levels (f.):<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">a.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Paragraph ii: I think the majority view is that automation should only be for routine functions (and not for controversial or subjective decisions such as on redelegations).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:54.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">b.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Paragraph iii: Previously a stand-alone point.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">5.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Policy based (g): other than some minor editing, there are two alternatives for g.ii. as noted above. I would note that there was no support in our last discussion to retain g.vi. (require bottom-up modalities) as this is treated elsewhere (in particular
in the chapeau text to g.).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">6.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Diversity of customers (h.): some (I hope) minor and uncontroversial edits in the chapeau and in i. and ii. The text in paragraph iii was generally agreed.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">7.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Separability: modifications to i.i. and i.iii generally agreed in the last discussion.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt">8.<span style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
</span>Multi-stakeholder principle paragraph j: generally agreed in the last discussion subject to concerns about wording (the previous text appeared to recommend direct involvement in the management of the IANA function).<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>