<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Erick,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">The national policy authority would either be the registry should there not be regulation or the regulator (or government) if there was. In practice in this
latter case responsibility is likely to be shared as there will be some areas where one or the other had specific responsibility.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">So the current wording does reflect diversity of legal systems. My concern is that yours focuses only on regulated or law-based models. And as I mentioned
previously, it will not be acceptable to allow the IANA functions operator to have a say over .uk just because the UK government does not see its vocation to run or regulate a TLD.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">For the second point, I’m sorry if I was not clear. I do not want to give the IANA functions operator any role over .uk registrants. If there is an issue,
this would need to be resolved under UK law.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Erick Iriarte [mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 04 March 2015 14:13<br>
<b>To:</b> Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Cc:</b> CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Again<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">talking about “regulation" and not “authority” will be more open to include more cctlds, we must respect that diversity of legal systems and also origin of ccTLDs (governmental, civil society, private sector, academia, )<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">About the second point, which is your specific proposal against my proposal?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Erick<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">El 4/3/2015, a las 15:02, Martin Boyle <<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>> escribió:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Erick,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Not really: we are not regulated, we devise our own policies which are not laws or regulations (we are not a regulator either) and we still do not want the
IANA functions operator feeling that it has the right to impose rules on us.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’m sorry: I appear to have missed a second change in your edits: the addition of “existing registrants’ use of the ccTLD.” I have similar problems with
this, I’m afraid: I do not think that it is up to the IANA functions operator to decide what is best for .uk domain name holders. If we fail to look after registrants’ rights, we are going to see court action in the UK or lose market share in a very competitive
domain name market. Similarly, if we let or encourage malicious behaviour in .uk we will fall foul of UK laws or suffer reputational damage and see (again) a loss of market share.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">There might be a principle associated with protecting registrants, but I’m not sure it ever belongs in an IANA stewardship transition and certainly not in any
increase of power for the IANA functions operator.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Best</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">Erick
Iriarte [<a href="mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com"><span style="color:purple">mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com</span></a>]<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>04 March 2015 12:35<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Cc:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Martin<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">thanks for your message. We can change Law by Regulation (that including if i’m correct UK and common law system).<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Not all the ccTLDs are related to one Authority specific in all the countries so we must have the most open option for all.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Yours,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Erick<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">El 4/3/2015, a las 13:19, Martin Boyle <<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk"><span style="color:purple">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</span></a>> escribió:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thanks Erick,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">In essence you are proposing changing the words “policy authority” to “laws related to each ccTLD”. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I would have a concern with this in that .uk policy is developed through our own national process rooted in the local community and working in a multi-stakeholder
process (and the same is the case for many other ccTLDs). Our policies are not written in law, but are based on a national discussion leading to general consensus. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">What I like about the current formulation is that this policy authority cannot be overturned by a zealous Californian-based organisation with its own idea of
what is the right way to do things. Your wording would seem to open this as an option because our policies are not laws (although they would not conflict with the UK’s legal requirements).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’d welcome your thoughts, and any further explanation of your proposal. Could you see an alternative that ensured the safeguards that are in the current text?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thanks</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">Erick
Iriarte [<a href="mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com"><span style="color:purple">mailto:eiriarte@iriartelaw.com</span></a>]<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>04 March 2015 11:38<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Cc:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">HI Martin, <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I have reviewed your document and thank you for inviting comments on it.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">i would like to suggest a change in clause h.ii<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">"ii. For ccTLDs: the IANA Functions Operator should provide a service without requiring a contract and should respect the diversity of agreements and arrangements in place for ccTLDs. In particular, the nationals laws related to each ccTLD should
be respected and no additional requirements should be imposed unless they are directly and demonstrably linked to global security, stability, resilience of the DNS and existing registrants use of the ccTLD."<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Yours, Erick<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Erick<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">El 3/3/2015, a las 10:09, Martin Boyle <<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk"><span style="color:purple">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</span></a>> escribió:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Colleagues,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">My apologies, but following the Christmas break I failed to progress this discussion. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I now attach a revised draft, still with a major outstanding issue in g. (page 2). </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">There are two variants for g.ii. One simply reduces the previous paragraph to read “For ccTLDs, respect national sovereignty;” at the request of the GAC. The other is more
closely based on, but shortens, the previous text: “For ccTLDs, policy decisions may be made locally through nationally agreed processes in accordance with national laws and in compliance with IETF technical standards. Post transition of the IANA function
nothing will be done by ICANN/IANA to impact the stable operation of ccTLD Registries and gTLD Registries.”</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">The draft contains a number of marked up edits from previous discussions that seem to have general agreement. For the text redlines:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">1.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I
have deleted the section heading “Introduction”: there are no other section headings, so this appears to be superfluous.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">2.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Principles
b. and c. (previously sub-clauses to the heading on security, stability and resilience) are now stand-alone at the request of the GAC.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">3.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Accountability
& transparency (e.):</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">a.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
i: two edits that appear to have general agreement.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">b.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
ii: a new edit to correct the text. The new version amends the text to reflect the sub-heading. The old version put it the other way around.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">c.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
iv: Footnote on capture added as requested courtesy of Alan Greenberg & Milton Mueller.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">d.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
vi: While I think we all agree on the need for some form of appeals process, there is still some debate as to where that should lie. So for example, the appeals process might well not be designed by the CWG and might be the responsibility of the CCWG. For
ccTLDs, it might mean that a third party might have a say over a national decision on a ccTLD. I flag this in case further thought is needed in the light of discussion over the last few days.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">4.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Service
levels (f.):</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">a.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
ii: I think the majority view is that automation should only be for routine functions (and not for controversial or subjective decisions such as on redelegations).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:54.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">b.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Paragraph
iii: Previously a stand-alone point.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">5.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Policy
based (g): other than some minor editing, there are two alternatives for g.ii. as noted above. I would note that there was no support in our last discussion to retain g.vi. (require bottom-up modalities) as this is treated elsewhere (in particular in the
chapeau text to g.).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">6.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Diversity
of customers (h.): some (I hope) minor and uncontroversial edits in the chapeau and in i. and ii. The text in paragraph iii was generally agreed.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">7.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Separability:
modifications to i.i. and i.iii generally agreed in the last discussion.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:36.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left:18.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:-18.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">8.</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt"> <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Multi-stakeholder
principle paragraph j: generally agreed in the last discussion subject to concerns about wording (the previous text appeared to recommend direct involvement in the management of the IANA function).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><Draft of Principles - updated 3 March.docx><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
</span><a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</span></a><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><br>
</span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:purple">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>