<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Yes, Martin. <br><br>Please also confirm that the "accountability processes" are those of ICANN or related to ICANN.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Thanks!<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Rinalia<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Martin Boyle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk" target="_blank">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-GB">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thanks Rinalia: yes, on re-reading I think that this does seem to have lost something in translation! I guess it is the process that needs to be independent
of the IANA functions operator, not the accountability itself. So if we said, <u></u>
<u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="1" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color:#1f497d"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">“<u>Independence of accountability</u>: accountability
</span><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:red">processes</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> should be independent of the IANA Functions Operator and should assure the accountability
of the Operator to the inclusive global multistakeholder community;”<u></u><u></u></span></li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">would this work, or am I missing something else?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Best<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Martin<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"" lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"" lang="EN-US"> Rinalia Abdul Rahim [mailto:<a href="mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com" target="_blank">rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 05 March 2015 03:19<br>
<b>To:</b> Martin Boyle<br>
<b>Cc:</b> CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p>Hi.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>I find 5.ii not easy to understand. Can the text be improved for clarity?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Thanks.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p>Rinalia<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mar 5, 2015 7:59 AM, "Martin Boyle" <<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk" target="_blank">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And special thanks to Elise and Paul for their cooperation on g.ii (now 7.ii), Stephanie for some useful proposed wording for j (now 10), Maarten Simon for some comments and suggested
edits and Erick for some interesting discussion on h.ii (now 8.ii).<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The result is perhaps a slightly more complicated document that it was on Tuesday evening!
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I propose that we look to:
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>Remove all the comments and accept all the editing that has not had any comment that is the side heading and paragraphs (using the new numbering) 2, 3, 5.i, 5.iv, 6.ii, 7 chapeau, 7.iii-vi, 8.i, 8.iii and 9.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>See whether the suggested compromise on 7.ii is acceptable.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>See whether the proposed text in 5.iii is acceptable.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>In the light of Maarten’s comment on <a href="http://5.vi" target="_blank">
5.vi</a>, check whether maintaining the current text (including removing the square brackets) is acceptable.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>See whether 6.iii should be retained and whether there is consensus to remove the square brackets.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>See if the edits proposed for 7.i are acceptable.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt">
</span>See if Stephanie’s proposal for 10 is acceptable.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If we have time I’d like to at least ask Erick to introduce the alternative he has proposed for 8.ii. However, it is not proving to be an easy discussion so I propose to take this
discussion off line as there is unlikely to be any resolution in time for or during tomorrow’s call.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks and I look forward to a constructive discussion tomorrow.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Martin<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>