<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">I know it is there! It represents the GAC’s preferences, it does not represent anything binding for this group.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">--MM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Lindeberg, Elise [mailto:elise.lindeberg@Nkom.no]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 5, 2015 6:56 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Milton L Mueller; Martin Boyle; CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> SV: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Milton - you are referring to the GAC Communique from Singapore. It can be discussed, but its already there
</span><span style="font-family:Wingdings;color:#1F497D">J</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Elise</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">Fra:</span></b><span lang="NO-BOK" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"> Milton L Mueller [<a href="mailto:mueller@syr.edu">mailto:mueller@syr.edu</a>]
<br>
<b>Sendt:</b> 5. mars 2015 12:52<br>
<b>Til:</b> Lindeberg, Elise; Martin Boyle; CWG Stewardship<br>
<b>Kopi:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Emne:</b> RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles and Criteria that Should Underpin Decisions on the Transition of NTIA Stewardship: New Draft</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NO-BOK"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Elise</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">I know it is an important issue for GAC, but it is also an important issue for the global Internet community. As part of that, I don’t think the GAC’s language here is acceptable:</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-indent:-.25in"><i><span lang="EN-AU" style="font-size:11.5pt;color:#4472C4">,
<span style="background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow">nothing in the FOIWG report should be read to limit or constrain applicable law and governmental decisions, or the IANA operatorīs ability to act in line with a request made by the relevant government.</span></span></i><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-indent:-.25in"><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU" style="color:#1F497D">Perhaps someone can correct me if I am wrong, but I would have to challenge the statement that there should be no limits on a government’s demands and that IANA must passively respond to _<i>any</i>_
request made by the relevant government. Doesn’t this contradict RFC 1591, which makes the ccTLD operator a trustee for _<i>both</i>_ the national and the global internet community. I think the reason for this is that people did not want to make a ccTLD a
political football that changes with any change in local political fortunes. One can respect national sovereignty over policy but one must also respect one’s obligations to the global internet community.
</span><span lang="NO-BOK"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>