<p dir="ltr">MM:<br>
.....But I do not think the board needs to be “multistakeholder” if “multistakeholder” means that all the different stakeholder groups involved in policy making have to be equally represented on it. Ideally the board of a PTI would be small and very technical</p>
<p dir="ltr">SO:<br>
Based on above, what then is the role of CSC? and more importantly where does multistakeholder come in....Is PTI just about creating more seats within ICANN for a few privileged without accountability to the community? As S-A mentioned, who/how does PTI not become more unaccountable than the current ICANN board.(paraphrased)</p>
<p dir="ltr">MM:<br>
In response to your last point, in my view the PTI board _<i>oversees</i>_ the IANA function; the operation of it, obviously, will be done by the staff</p>
<p dir="ltr">SO:<br>
Which is practically the role currently carried out by ICANN(board) as it concerns IANA function operation. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Overall maybe I am missing something in the puzzle</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr">sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 9 Apr 2015 22:42, "Milton L Mueller" <<a href="mailto:mueller@syr.edu">mueller@syr.edu</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="14ca02235c8edbc7__MailEndCompose"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></a></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">You mention ‘ a distinct governance body devoted to IANA performance and oversight issues’. Am I correct that your underlying assumption here is that the board of PTI will be a multistakeholder
body and that they will oversee (and operate) the IANA function ?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">Maarten - No. The Sidley-Austin discussion draft said the PTI board could be ICANN-controlled or “independent and multistakeholder.”<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">I think it’s obvious that the PT-IANA board should be _<i>independent</i>_ of ICANN – that would be a requirement of proper separation of the policy making function from IANA. But I do not think the board needs
to be “multistakeholder” if “multistakeholder” means that all the different stakeholder groups involved in policy making have to be equally represented on it. Ideally the board of a PTI would be small and very technical. It would be accountable to the broad
multi-stakeholder community through the Periodic Review Function. The PRF obviates the need for a MSH board.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">In response to your last point, in my view the PTI board _<i>oversees</i>_ the IANA function; the operation of it, obviously, will be done by the staff.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Milton L Mueller<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Syracuse University School of Information Studies<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/" target="_blank"><span style="color:#0563c1">http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/</span></a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Internet Governance Project<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://internetgovernance.org/" target="_blank"><span style="color:#0563c1">http://internetgovernance.org</span></a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>