<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">I guess it is aspirational.</div></div></blockquote></span><div><br></div><div>Well, it might have been the aspiration of folks who attended the E.int (later E.910) ITU meetings in Geneva (which did not include ICANN staff to my knowledge — I was general manager of IANA at that time so I probably would've known).</div><div><br></div><div>That was a long time ago and many things have changed. I personally don't think it should have any bearing on how .INT is dealt with post-transition.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>-drc</div><div><br></div></body></html>