<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">+1.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">The University of the West Indies is registered as <a href="http://uwi.edu">uwi.edu</a>.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">We are a regional institution with four campuses and 20 or so centres across the English-speaking Caribbean that began life with a royal [meaning British] charter as a university college of the University of London. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">We also manage the .bb and .jm ccTLDs.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:large">-Carlton</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><br>==============================<br>Carlton A Samuels<br>Mobile: 876-818-1799<br><i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment &amp; Turnaround</font></i><br>=============================</div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Martin Boyle <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk" target="_blank">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">





<div lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">Currently its policy on eligibility is “Only U.S. postsecondary institutions that are institutionally accredited by an agency on the U.S. Department of Education&#39;s
 list of Nationally Recognized Accrediting Agencies (see recognized accrediting bodies) may obtain an Internet name in the .edu domain. These include both &quot;Regional Institutional Accrediting Agencies&quot; and &quot;National Institutional and Specialized Accrediting
 Bodies&quot; recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.”  That seems to me to put it in the same group as the others.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">As Christopher says, .gov, .edu and .mil are really quite similar to US specialist ccTLDs – often dealt with at the second level for ccTLDs.  In that light,
 I think it is irrelevant who their registrants are (that is a national issue).  But I do not agree that it “belongs in” (by which I mean eligible to be a member of) the GNSO (and neither does it fit in the ccNSO).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">And I really do think we would be wasting our time to “clearly and narrowly” define education.  In .edu’s case, that is for Educause to work out.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">MB<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>CW Lists<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 14 May 2015 22:58<span class=""><br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a> IANA<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] .mil and .gov (and maybe .edu)<u></u><u></u></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&gt; <span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">Although not mentioned, .edu falls into roughly the same category.</span><u></u><u></u></p><div><div class="h5">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">Well, very roughly. Over the years, .edu has &#39;wobbled&#39; between a strictly US University Domain and something else (ill defined) including lower levels of education in the US
 and an international dimension.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">Before CWG goes further, someone should ask the Registry (¿Educause?) for a list of the current Registrants.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">My personal expectation would be that we shall finish up classifying .edu as a normal gTLD with a registration policy. However, it is NOT an &#39;open&#39; gTLD. In the era of on-line courses, what is &#39;education&#39; needs to be clearly and narrowly
 defined. Meanwhile, many countries use an .sld in their ccTLD for their Universities. e.g. &lt;<a href="http://www.soas.ac.uk/" target="_blank">http://www.soas.ac.uk/</a>&gt;<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Regards<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">CW<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 14 May 2015, at 21:49, Greg Shatan &lt;<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">In yesterday&#39;s Congressional hearings, the issue of .mil and .gov was brought up, due at least in part to the Defending Internet Freedom Act
<a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/5737" target="_blank">https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/5737</a>, and an opinion piece in US News &amp; World Report. <a href="http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2015/05/13/congress-should-ask-tough-questions-about-icann-domain-name-transition" target="_blank">http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2015/05/13/congress-should-ask-tough-questions-about-icann-domain-name-transition</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">The Defending Internet Freedom Act says (from the summary):<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0cm;line-height:12.0pt">
<u></u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt &quot;Times New Roman&quot;">        
</span></span></span><u></u><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">the U.S. government will be granted ownership of the &quot;.gov&quot; and &quot;.mil&quot; top-level domains and specified servers will be maintained in the United States;</span><span style="color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">A couple of the Representatives raised concerns that .gov and .mil</span><span style="font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">​</span><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">
 would be vulnerable to a transfer away from the USG, and asked the witnesses if ownership (or perpetual control) of .gov and .mil by the US should be ensured in the transition. S</span><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">everal panelists
 answered in the affirmative and I don&#39;t believe any opposed.</span><span style="color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt"><span style="color:#333333"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">We have not really discussed this issue.  I think it behooves us to deal with it.  Given the historical and current use of these two domains&lt; I would
 not expect too much controversy.</span><span style="color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt"><span style="color:#333333"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">Although not mentioned, .edu falls into roughly the same category.  We should consider if we should accord it similar treatment.</span><span style="color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt"><span style="color:#333333"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#333333">Greg</span><span style="color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>