<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Greg,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">It may be best if Alan responded to this because the R&D issue came up in DT-F.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chuck<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Greg Shatan<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 03, 2015 1:14 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Grace Abuhamad<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cwg-stewardship@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] DT-O recommendations/responses for Public Comment Review Tool<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">I think Item 3 needs to be clarified:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">3· Need for a budget to support R&D should be included (ALAC) – DT O / DT F</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:27.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt">
<b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF">DT-O recommendation</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">: The CWG-Stewardship recommends that there needs to be flexibility
to allow for spending related to R&D for other special project (e.g. DNSSEC, IPv6) which would need to be covered as part of PTI operations (as also recommended by DT F). These would be included in the draft budget which is expected to be presented 9 months
in advance as part of the presentation of the proposed budget.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">Perhaps someone within ICANN and/or IANA can provide information on how much "R&D" or innovation development goes on within the IANA Functions group (which I envision as Elise Gerich and
her reports), and how much of that goes on elsewhere within ICANN or outside ICANN (e.g., IETF). Perhaps this could be answered with regard to the examples given (DNSSEC and IPv6); I would assume the IANA Functions group was consulted at points in development
and particularly with regard to deployment, but it was not my impression that these were "researched and developed" within the IANA team.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">Unless there are good reasons to change, we should follow and fund the current model for division of labor on development/innovation vs. implementation. It would help to clarify this, and
perhaps tighten up the language a bit, to avoid the impression that IANA is going to become a big-time R&D shop.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">Greg<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org" target="_blank">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Dear all, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Here below are the DT-O responses and recommendations for the Public Comment Review Tool<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">1· Consider InternetNZ experience with regards to budget development (InternetNZ) – DT O</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:27.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt">
<b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF">DT-O recommendation</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">: PTI will submit a budget to ICANN 9 months in advance, and that
ICANN would approve it at least 3 months in advance of the fiscal year. And, CWG-Stewardship supports budget transparency. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">2· CWG will need to develop a proposed process for the IANA-specific budget review (CCWG) – DT O</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:27.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt">
<b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF">DT-O recommendation</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">: CWG-Stewardship agrees with the comment of the CCWG-Accountability
chairs for the first year's budget and notes that a process should be developed possibly as part of the implementation of the proposal. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">3· Need for a budget to support R&D should be included (ALAC) – DT O / DT F</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:27.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt">
<b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF">DT-O recommendation</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">: The CWG-Stewardship recommends that there needs to be flexibility
to allow for spending related to R&D for other special project (e.g. DNSSEC, IPv6) which would need to be covered as part of PTI operations (as also recommended by DT F). These would be included in the draft budget which is expected to be presented 9 months
in advance as part of the presentation of the proposed budget.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">4· PTI should be adequately funded and need to ensure that expenditures are appropriate – should be clarified (IPC) – CWG</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:27.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt">
<b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF">DT-O Recommendation</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">: Budget process referred to previously (PTI will submit a budget
to ICANN 9 months in advance, and that ICANN would approve it at least 3 months in advance of the fiscal year). 1 year of operating expenses updated on annual basis in escrow for use by PTI, and an additional year kept open to low-risk investments. Both years
of funds would be for use of funding PTI in case ICANN is unable (for some future reason) to fund PTI. Appropriateness of expenses will be handled through CCWG Accountability process. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">5· Separation Costs: Some comments dealt with concerns about how IANA expenses would be covered following a separation process. DT-N
supports this recommendation. We look to the full CWG for a determination on where this issue is best resolved (DT N, DT L, DT O or full CWG).</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:27.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt">
<b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF">DT-O Recommendation:
</span></b><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Separation costs are not required at the point of transition, but this information could be requested to be developed within the first year of implementation. In first
year, increase by 10% each of the following until such estimates can be provided: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> - 1 year of operating expenses updated on annual basis in escrow for use by PTI, and </span><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#0433FF"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> - an additional year earmarked open to low-risk investments..<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;min-height:12px"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Best, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Grace<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><Gomes>, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Sunday, May 31, 2015 at 9:54 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>"DT-O Mailing List (<a href="mailto:dto@icann.org" target="_blank">dto@icann.org</a>)" <<a href="mailto:dto@icann.org" target="_blank">dto@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[DT-O] FW: Updated public comment action items summary<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Here are the action items from this summary that relate to DT-O that I think require more discussion
on our part. Please review them and comment on this list.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chuck</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:18.15pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt;color:black;background:lime">
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">Consider InternetNZ experience with regards to budget development (InternetNZ) –
<i>DT O</i></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.15pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">CWG response:
</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">CWG appreciates the input provided and suggests that those steps be customized for how PTI is expected to develop its budget (as a best practice). Note that
the ATRT2 also had recommendations concerning budget that might be applicable here.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:18.15pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt;color:black;background:lime">
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">CWG will need to develop a proposed process for the IANA-specific budget review (CCWG) –
<i>DT O</i></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">CWG response: CWG agrees with the comment of the CCWG-Accountability chairs and notes
that a process should be developed possibly as part of the implementation of the proposal. The CWG should consider whether there are any elements that should be developed as part of the final proposal.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:18.15pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt;color:black;background:lime">
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">Need for a budget to support R&D should be included (ALAC) –
<i>DT O / DT F</i></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.15pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">CWG response: The CWG recommends that there needs to be flexibility to allow for spending related to R&D which would need to be covered as part of PTI operations (as
also recommended by DT F). It is the expectation that these would be included in the draft budget which is expected to be presented 9 months in advance as part of the presentation of the proposed budget.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:18.15pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt;color:black;background:lime">
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">PTI should be adequately funded and need to ensure that expenditures are appropriate – should be clarified (IPC) –
<i>CWG</i></span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:.15pt">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">CWG response: See previous response concerning adequate funding. Setting of budget between PTI and ICANN should happen in a transparent way, but no additional say
for the community unless there are indications that there is not sufficient funding or “gold plating”, noting that there are also other mechanisms available to provide input on the budget, including the CCWG mechanisms.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:18.15pt;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">·</span><span style="font-size:7.0pt;color:black;background:lime">
</span><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black;background:lime">Separation Costs:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-autospace:none">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:black;background:lime">Some comments dealt with concerns about how IANA expenses would be covered following a separation process. DT-N supports this recommendation. We look to the full CWG for
a determination on where this issue is best resolved (DT N, DT L, DT O or full CWG).</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;text-autospace:none">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif";color:black;background:lime">CWG response: Regarding operation costs, the CWG notes the RySG suggestion to have a sufficient portion of registry fees dedicated to the IANA services. The CWG also recognizes
that there would be transition costs and ongoing operation costs related to the possible selection of a new operator, which are expected to be covered by ICANN. The CWG will review the proposal and clarify accordingly.</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:black"><a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>
[<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Marika Konings<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 29, 2015 11:10 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [CWG-Stewardship] Updated public comment action items summary</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Dear all,</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Please find attached the updated summary of public comment action items as updated with the CWG responses
as discussed during the calls over the last two days. Staff will be incorporating these responses in the public comment review tool (complete version). Design Teams are requested to provide any additional responses that need to be included in the public comment
review tool by Monday 1 June at the latest. </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Thanks,</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">Marika</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>