<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Martin - I completely agree - and wondering the same - my question
was to more to whether or not we have stated this power anywhere - I
don't recall (and don't think so).<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/5/2015 8:08 AM, Martin Boyle
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:4ED5D5CBDF5F3E499DB990B095F010FE81A8EDCA@wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \,serif";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’m
missing something, Matthew.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’d
have issues with ICANN launching an RfP without some sort of
community endorsement. After all, ICANN becomes the
stewardship home of a community resource because it brings
in the multi-stakeholder community.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Why
might ICANN want to launch an RfP? If there are good
reasons, then we would need to write around this (these)
particular reason(s). As a conspiracy theorist, I need
convincing that this is a benign power.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US"> Matthew Shears [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mailto:mshears@cdt.org</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 05 June 2015 14:54<br>
<b>To:</b> Greg Shatan; Staffan Jonson<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Martin Boyle; Milton L Mueller;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response
from DT-M regarding public comments<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I agree Greg
and have similar concerns to Staffan and Martin. But on your
second point have we specified how the board would do this:<br>
<br>
t<i>he Board could initiate an RFP or other change to IANA
functions operations without a SIFR</i><br>
<br>
Matthew<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 6/5/2015 12:48 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">I see this as a community power. Frankly,
the Board could initiate an RFP or other change to IANA
functions operations without a SIFR.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Greg<br>
<br>
On Friday, June 5, 2015, Staffan Jonson <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:staffan.jonson@iis.se">staffan.jonson@iis.se</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US">The rationale for giving ICANN (or PTI)
the ability to initiate a SIFR would allude to some
general principles of transparency (’everybody
should be able to check everybody’). In my view the
principles behind is an interesting discussion, but
not very much more. The current Hybrid model and
contract governance give ICANN a lot of power, the
upper hand so to say. So according to proposal ICANN
will already control IANA functions operations. </span>
<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US">So who would ICANN scrutinize with its
review power? Its own supporting organizations?
SO:s and AC:s? Most cc:s are not even contracted
with ICANN, and have few plans to become. Or would
ICANN need to review its own IANA operations with an
external organization? The latter would to me
indicate lack of control. Or dual representation by
MS community.</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US">So a practical answer is: It wouldn’t
need to. And I see very few possibilities of change
in this area.
</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US">So my answer is more along a pragmatic
stream: Is this relevant for the CWG? Now? Do we
really, really need to include this aspect in
transition? This late? Are we limiting our
deliberations to what is absolutely necessary for
the transition, or are we – once the window of
ooportunity is open- trying to make it a perfect
world? I would say no to both.
</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US">Another answer relates to direct
process: The need for a review is about
accountability, so any power for ICANN to review
itself should preferably be discussed by CCWG (WS2).
</span>
<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US">However what might be valid, is that
ICG soon will have to handle up to three parallel
mechanisms for review (one from each community
within CWG). Maybe we should remind them of the
potential need to coordinate review mechanisms. </span><span
lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US">Staffan </span>
<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US">With best regards</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US">Staffan Jonson</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US">Mr. Staffan Jonson, Senior Policy
Adviser</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US">.SE (The Internet Infrastructure
foundation)</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US">BOX 7399 | SE-103 91 STOCKHOLM | SWEDEN</span><span
lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US">Direct: +46 8 452 35 74 | SMS: +46 73
317 39 67</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-US"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','staffan.jonson@iis.se');"
target="_blank">staffan.jonson@iis.se</a> |
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.iis.se/en" target="_blank">www.iis.se/en</a></span><span
lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><b><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US">Från:</span></b><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US">
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');"
target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');"
target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>För </b>Martin Boyle<br>
</span><b><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="SV">Skickat:</span></b><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="SV"> den 5 juni 2015 12:01<br>
<b>Till:</b> Matthew Shears; Milton L Mueller; <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');"
target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Ämne:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final
response from DT-M regarding public comments</span><span
lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
lang="SV"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-CA">I struggle to imagine why the ICANN
Board (any more than the PTI Board) would want to
initiate an SIFR, in particular without the support
of the community. Worse, I would feel that there
would be a “cunning plan” somewhere behind such a
decision and that leaves me seriously questioning
why we would want this process to be triggered in
such a way. No support for an SIFR, no overriding
ICANN (or PTI) Board to ignore interests of the
community.</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-CA">If someone can see possible reasons,
I’d like to hear them. Then any trigger route could
be defined (and limited) more carefully.</span><span
lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-CA"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-CA">Martin</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-CA"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US">
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');"
target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');"
target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Matthew Shears<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 05 June 2015 06:17<br>
<b>To:</b> Milton L Mueller; <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');"
target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final
response from DT-M regarding public comments</span><span
lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
lang="EN-CA"> </span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
lang="EN-CA">But what would the thresholds be? And,
currently an SIFR comes as a result of other
mechanisms being exhausted as well as the IANA
probems resolution process.<br>
<br>
<i>The Special IFR would be triggered by a
supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO
Councils according to their normal procedures for
determining supermajority.
</i></span><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman ,serif","serif""><br>
<br>
Would we require a supermajority of only the Board,
or in addition to the ccNSO and GNSO. And as a
result of the mechanisms being exhausted? I would
assume so.<br>
<br>
Matthew</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><span
style="font-family:"Times New Roman
,serif","serif"">On 6/5/2015 4:05
AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:</span><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre>I can't <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>--MM<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre>-----Original Message-----<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>From: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship');" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship</a>-<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 5:02 PM<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','avri@acm.org');" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>; <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>comments<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Good catch Avri and good question. Can anyone think of a reason why the<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>ICANN Board should not be able to request an SIFR?<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Chuck<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>-----Original Message-----<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>From: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship');" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship</a>-<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Avri Doria<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:39 PM<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>comments<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Hi,<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>I am part of DT-M and partly responsible for this.<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>But. It has a cost, which I did mention on the DT-M list:<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>There is currently no mechanism defined for the Board to initiate a SIFR.<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Should there be?<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>avri<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>On 04-Jun-15 16:10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Here is DT-M's final proposed response to comment review tool item #<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>246 regarding AFRALO's suggestion that the PTI Board be allowed to<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>initiate a SIFR directly: *"DT M carefully considered the<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>recommendation to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>decided against that while at the same time noting that the PTI Board<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>could request that the ICANN Board consider doing so."*<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>If there are any questions, please let me know.<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Chuck<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> "This message (including any attachments) is intended only<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> addressed, and may contain information that is non-public,<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> attorney work product. If you are not the intended<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> this message immediately."<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>---<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre> <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-family:"Times New Roman
,serif","serif""> </span><span
lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre>-- <span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Matthew Shears<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre>+ 44 (0)771 247 2987<span lang="SV"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Matthew Shears<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>+ 44 (0)771 247 2987<o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987</pre>
</body>
</html>