<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Dear all, </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Attached is the updated proposal. This version includes the edits listed below. </span><font color="#ff0000"><b>Your comments are requested and welcome until Sunday 23:59 UTC.</b></font> If you don’t have time to read the whole proposal, I’ve highlighted specific areas in the document that require feedback. </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><div><b>Areas that require feedback</b>: </div><ul><li>Paragraph 164 (p.32): needs text</li><li>Paragraph 172 (p.34): DT-F to confirm edit</li><li>Section IV edits should be reviewed by CWG (Andrew perhaps?)</li><li>Section VI edits should be reviewed by CWG (Avri perhaps?) </li><li>Footnote (p.65): DT-N to respond to Sidley about status of footnote</li><li>Page 73: DT-C to confirm response to Sidley comment</li><li>Page 80: DT-M to review footnote</li><li>Page 81: DT-M/DT-C to comment on Sidley note </li><li>Paragraph 389 (p.92): DT-N/SR/X to define “Review Team Liaison” per Sidley’s comment</li><li>Page 111 & 112: Bernard to address Sidley comments</li></ul></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><b>Edits included in version 3</b>: </div><div><ul><li style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">All the comments & edits from Greg, Avri, Sidley, Lise and Andrew. </li><li style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">The following items from today’s call: </li><ul><li style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in;">Paragraph</span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in; background-color: white;">123 has been reviewed to be internally consistent </span></li><li style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in;">Paragraph</span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in; background-color: white;">141: adjusted text around CCWG-Accountability structure</span></li><li style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in;">Paragraph</span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in; background-color: white;"> 167: removed sentence </span></li><li><span style="text-indent: -0.25in; background-color: white;"><font face="Arial,sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Paragraph 170: Removed the word </span><span style="font-size: 13px;">“</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">multistakholder" and use 'customer-based' instead)</span></font></span></li><li style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; text-indent: -0.25in; background-color: white; font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-size: 7pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span></span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in; background-color: white; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Added footnote to paragraph 169 about .INT (footnote is also in Annex to section II)</span></li><li style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in; background-color: white;">Paragraph 275: fixed composition of IFRT (and also fixed this in SCWG composition)</span></li><li><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; text-indent: -0.25in;">Annex S</span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;"><font face="Arial,sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">: <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Added disclaimer about term sheet</span></span></font></span></li></ul><li><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">DT C Charter updates (see Section III and Annex G)</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Section IV edits</span></li><li><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;">Section VI edits</span></li></ul></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">As you know, we had a technical glitch with document versions right before the call yesterday. In recovering the version, there were a lot of formatting changes that had to be done. I have attached version 2.5 (the in-between version) so that you have it, <b>but please note that version 3 is the version to work off of.</b> There are still lots of formatting fixes in version 3, but we will work on these over the weekend and on Monday. </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><br></div><div>We are almost there!</div><div>Grace</div></body></html>