<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thanks Maarten.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chuck<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> Maarten Simon [mailto:maarten.simon@sidn.nl]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 05, 2015 11:44 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck; Matthew Shears; Martin Boyle; Greg Shatan; Staffan Jonson<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cwg-stewardship@icann.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments<br>
<b>Importance:</b> High<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Hi Chuck<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I might be missing something, but the discussion is, if I understand it correctly, on the ability of the ICANN board while AFRALO’s suggestion is on the PTI Board (as is
your suggested response).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">I however agree with you and others that I do not see why the ICANN board would ever want to initiate a SIFR as it can directly influence the IANA performance through its
powers over PTI. So my opinion is to not give the ICANN board this ability.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Best,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Maarten <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday 5 June 2015 17:17<br>
<b>To: </b>Matthew Shears <<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>>, Martin Boyle <<a href="mailto:Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk">Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk</a>>, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>,
Staffan Jonson <<a href="mailto:staffan.jonson@iis.se">staffan.jonson@iis.se</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">The discussion about whether the ICANN Board should be allowed to initiate a SIFR has been very useful in my view. Based on all the points made so far, I am
leaning toward not giving the ICANN Board the ability to initiate an SIFR and, considering where we are time-wise in terms of finalizing our proposal, I think we need to make a decision on this today if possible.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">To bring all of this back into focus, the catalyst for this issue came from this DT-M recommendation: “</span>Here is DT-M's final proposed response to comment review tool item # 246 regarding AFRALO's suggestion that the PTI Board be allowed to initiate a SIFR directly: *"DT M carefully considered the recommendation to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but decided against that while at the same time noting that the PTI Board could request that the ICANN Board consider doing so."*<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">”</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I suggest the following as response to AFRALO’s comment: “</span>DT M carefully considered the suggestion to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but decided to recommend that the CWG not support it. After additional and fairly extensive discussion, the CWG decided to support the DT-M recommendation, noting that the PTI Board could communicate any reasons it has for further escalation of a problem to the CSC, which could then consider whether to escalate the problem to the ccNSO and GNSO.<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">”</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Is this a reasonable response? Edits are welcome. But let’s try to resolve this today.</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chuck</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Matthew Shears<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 05, 2015 8:11 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Martin Boyle; Greg Shatan; Staffan Jonson<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Martin - I completely agree - and wondering the same - my question was to more to whether or not we have stated this power anywhere - I don't recall (and don't think so).<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 6/5/2015 8:08 AM, Martin Boyle wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’m missing something, Matthew.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’d have issues with ICANN launching an RfP without some sort of community endorsement. After all, ICANN becomes the stewardship home of a community resource
because it brings in the multi-stakeholder community.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Why might ICANN want to launch an RfP? If there are good reasons, then we would need to write around this (these) particular reason(s). As a conspiracy theorist,
I need convincing that this is a benign power.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> Matthew Shears [<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mailto:mshears@cdt.org</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 05 June 2015 14:54<br>
<b>To:</b> Greg Shatan; Staffan Jonson<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Martin Boyle; Milton L Mueller; <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I agree Greg and have similar concerns to Staffan and Martin. But on your second point have we specified how the board would do this:<br>
<br>
t<i>he Board could initiate an RFP or other change to IANA functions operations without a SIFR</i><br>
<br>
Matthew<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 6/5/2015 12:48 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">I see this as a community power. Frankly, the Board could initiate an RFP or other change to IANA functions operations without a SIFR.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Greg<br>
<br>
On Friday, June 5, 2015, Staffan Jonson <<a href="mailto:staffan.jonson@iis.se">staffan.jonson@iis.se</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">The rationale for giving ICANN (or PTI) the ability to initiate a SIFR would allude to some general principles of
transparency (’everybody should be able to check everybody’). In my view the principles behind is an interesting discussion, but not very much more. The current Hybrid model and contract governance give ICANN a lot of power, the upper hand so to say. So according
to proposal ICANN will already control IANA functions operations. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">So who would ICANN scrutinize with its review power? Its own supporting organizations? SO:s and AC:s? Most cc:s are
not even contracted with ICANN, and have few plans to become. Or would ICANN need to review its own IANA operations with an external organization? The latter would to me indicate lack of control. Or dual representation by MS community.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">So a practical answer is: It wouldn’t need to. And I see very few possibilities of change in this area.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">So my answer is more along a pragmatic stream: Is this relevant for the CWG? Now? Do we really, really need to include
this aspect in transition? This late? Are we limiting our deliberations to what is absolutely necessary for the transition, or are we – once the window of ooportunity is open- trying to make it a perfect world? I would say no to both.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Another answer relates to direct process: The need for a review is about accountability, so any power for ICANN to
review itself should preferably be discussed by CCWG (WS2). </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">However what might be valid, is that ICG soon will have to handle up to three parallel mechanisms for review (one
from each community within CWG). Maybe we should remind them of the potential need to coordinate review mechanisms. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">Staffan <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">With best regards<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">Staffan Jonson<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">Mr. Staffan Jonson, Senior Policy Adviser<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">.SE (The Internet Infrastructure foundation)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">BOX 7399 | SE-103 91 STOCKHOLM | SWEDEN<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">Direct: +46 8 452 35 74 | SMS: +46 73 317 39 67<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','staffan.jonson@iis.se');" target="_blank">staffan.jonson@iis.se</a> |
<a href="http://www.iis.se/en" target="_blank">www.iis.se/en</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext">Från:</span></b><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>För </b>Martin Boyle<br>
</span><b><span lang="SV" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext">Skickat:</span></b><span lang="SV" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> den 5 juni 2015 12:01<br>
<b>Till:</b> Matthew Shears; Milton L Mueller; <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Ämne:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="SV"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I struggle to imagine why the ICANN Board (any more than the PTI Board) would want to initiate an SIFR,
in particular without the support of the community. Worse, I would feel that there would be a “cunning plan” somewhere behind such a decision and that leaves me seriously questioning why we would want this process to be triggered in such a way. No support
for an SIFR, no overriding ICANN (or PTI) Board to ignore interests of the community.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">If someone can see possible reasons, I’d like to hear them. Then any trigger route could be defined
(and limited) more carefully.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Martin</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="EN-CA" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Matthew Shears<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 05 June 2015 06:17<br>
<b>To:</b> Milton L Mueller; <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">
cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public comments</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span lang="EN-CA"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-CA">But what would the thresholds be? And, currently an SIFR comes as a result of other mechanisms being exhausted as well as the IANA probems resolution process.<br>
<br>
<i>The Special IFR would be triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils according to their normal procedures for determining supermajority.
</i></span><br>
<br>
Would we require a supermajority of only the Board, or in addition to the ccNSO and GNSO. And as a result of the mechanisms being exhausted? I would assume so.<br>
<br>
Matthew<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto">On 6/5/2015 4:05 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre>I can't <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>--MM<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre>-----Original Message-----<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>From: <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship');" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship</a>-<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 5:02 PM<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To: <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','avri@acm.org');" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>; <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>comments<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Good catch Avri and good question. Can anyone think of a reason why the<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>ICANN Board should not be able to request an SIFR?<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Chuck<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>-----Original Message-----<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>From: <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a> [<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship');" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship</a>-<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bounces@icann.org');" target="_blank">bounces@icann.org</a>] On Behalf Of Avri Doria<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:39 PM<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To: <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cwg-stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Final response from DT-M regarding public<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>comments<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Hi,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>I am part of DT-M and partly responsible for this.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>But. It has a cost, which I did mention on the DT-M list:<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>There is currently no mechanism defined for the Board to initiate a SIFR.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Should there be?<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>avri<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>On 04-Jun-15 16:10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:<o:p></o:p></pre>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Here is DT-M's final proposed response to comment review tool item #<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>246 regarding AFRALO's suggestion that the PTI Board be allowed to<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>initiate a SIFR directly: *"DT M carefully considered the<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>recommendation to allow the PTI Board to initiate a Special IFR but<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>decided against that while at the same time noting that the PTI Board<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>could request that the ICANN Board consider doing so."*<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If there are any questions, please let me know.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Chuck<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> "This message (including any attachments) is intended only<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> addressed, and may contain information that is non-public,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> attorney work product. If you are not the intended<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> this message immediately."<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>---<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>CWG-Stewardship mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship@icann.org');" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Matthew Shears<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>+ 44 (0)771 247 2987<o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Matthew Shears<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>+ 44 (0)771 247 2987<o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Matthew Shears<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Global Internet Policy and Human Rights<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>+ 44 (0)771 247 2987<o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>