<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Same as Chuck and Matthew...</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Matthew Shears <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    My understanding was the same as Chuck&#39;s.  <br>
    <br>
    Matthew<div><div class="h5"><br>
    <br>
    <div>On 6/11/2015 11:53 AM, Gomes, Chuck
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    </div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
      
      
      
      <div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">In
            fact, my understanding is that the CSC cannot launch a
            Special IFR but only escalates to the ccNSO and GNSO for
            that consideration.  Donna/Staffan – please correct me if I
            am wrong on that.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">Chuck<u></u><u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
        <div>
          <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:windowtext">
                <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>
                [<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org</a>] <b>
                  On Behalf Of </b>Jonathan Robinson<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:45 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> &#39;Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond&#39;;
                <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Triggering of
                Special IFR<u></u><u></u></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d" lang="EN-CA">Olivier,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d" lang="EN-CA"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d" lang="EN-CA">I agree with you understanding in the second
            instance i.e. as per Annex F.
            <u></u><u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d" lang="EN-CA"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-CA">&quot; </span><span style="color:#3366ff">Following
            the exhaustion of the above escalation mechanisms, the ccNSO
            and GNSO will be responsible for checking and reviewing
            the outcome of the CSC process (as defined in Annex G), and
            the IANA Problem Resolution Process (as defined in Annex J)
            and for determining whether or not a Special IFR is
            necessary. After consideration, which may include a public
            comment period and must include meaningful consultation with
            other SO/ACs, the Special IFR could be triggered by a
            supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils
            according to their normal procedures for determining
            supermajority.
          </span>&quot;<br>
          <br>
          To me, this translates to: a special IFR can be launched by
          CSC *and* GNSO *and* ccNSO agreeing that a special IFR needs
          to be launched. It is impossible for the CSC *or* the GNSO
          *or* the ccNSO to launch a special IFR singlehandedly.<span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d" lang="EN-CA"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d" lang="EN-CA"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d" lang="EN-CA">Jonathan<u></u><u></u></span></p>
        <div>
          <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:windowtext">
                Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank">mailto:ocl@gih.com</a>] <br>
                <b>Sent:</b> 11 June 2015 08:30<br>
                <b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> [CWG-Stewardship] Triggering of Special
                IFR<u></u><u></u></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-CA">Hello all<br>
            <br>
            looking at the slide deck for the presentation (downloadable
            from <a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778352" target="_blank">
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778352</a> ),
            page 12 , I raised a question on the first Webinar.<br>
            The slide says: </span><span style="color:#3366ff" lang="EN-CA">&quot;Review cycles: 1st review to occur no more
            than 2 years post-transition; then every 5 years. Or by
            special request of CSC, GNSO, or ccNSO (Special IFR).&quot;</span><span lang="EN-CA"><br>
            <br>
            I took up this sentence and asked: &quot;A Special IFR can be
            launched by CSC, GNSO, *or* ccNSO? I was under the
            impression that a Special IFR can be launched by CSC, GNSO
            *and* ccNSO&quot; only.<br>
            <br>
            I was told, in response, that the slide is correct, and an
            IFR can be launched by the CSC, or ccNSO or GNSO.<br>
            <br>
            The *or* vs. *and* is very important.<br>
            <br>
            So I looked at the proposal again, Annex F.<br>
            <br>
            &quot; </span><span style="color:#3366ff">Following the
            exhaustion of the above escalation mechanisms, the ccNSO and
            GNSO will be responsible for checking and reviewing
            the outcome of the CSC process (as defined in Annex G), and
            the IANA Problem Resolution Process (as defined in Annex J)
            and for determining whether or not a Special IFR is
            necessary. After consideration, which may include a public
            comment period and must include meaningful consultation with
            other SO/ACs, the Special IFR could be triggered by a
            supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils
            according to their normal procedures for determining
            supermajority.
          </span>&quot;<br>
          <br>
          To me, this translates to: a special IFR can be launched by
          CSC *and* GNSO *and* ccNSO agreeing that a special IFR needs
          to be launched. It is impossible for the CSC *or* the GNSO
          *or* the ccNSO to launch a special IFR singlehandedly.<br>
          <br>
          So is the slide on page 12 and the response I was given on the
          First Webinar right or wrong? This is a serious issue.<br>
          <br>
          Kind regards,<br>
          <br>
          Olivier<span lang="EN-GB"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      </div></div><pre>_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></pre><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    </font></span></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    <br>
    <pre cols="72">-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy &amp; Technology (CDT)
<a href="tel:%2B%2044%20%280%29771%20247%202987" value="+447712472987" target="_blank">+ 44 (0)771 247 2987</a></pre>
  </font></span></div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>