<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
h2
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 2 Char";
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:18.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.Heading2Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 2 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 2";
font-family:"Cambria","serif";
color:#4F81BD;
font-weight:bold;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Alan,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Thank-you for your acceptance of the current wording.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Please note that from my recall, Sidley proposed the introduction of “each” as legally less ambiguous. I believe the chat record from Tuesday’s meeting will confirm this but haven’t yet checked.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>If this is so, I suggest we stick with it (each).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Jonathan<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] <br><b>Sent:</b> 11 June 2015 04:46<br><b>To:</b> Greg Shatan<br><b>Cc:</b> CWG<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Important: Final Proposal for review until 23:59 UTC on 10 June<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Understood. But to ensure proper intent and translation, I think less potentially ambiguous.<br><br>Alan<br><br>At 10/06/2015 08:34 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Each means both in this sentence. (A bill requires approval of each house of Congress before it is sent to the President.)<br>Either would mean one or the other.<br><br>That said both also works.<br><br>On Wednesday, June 10, 2015, Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a> > wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>A few minutes late, but...<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>In paragraph 125, page 24 of V4, I can live with the current wording about the optional Public Comment but meaningful AC/SO consultation. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>However, the wording change I requested to clarify that the BOTH the ccNSO and GNSO approval is needed was not made. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>...triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils ...<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>should read<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>...triggered by a supermajority vote of BOTH of the ccNSO and GNSO Councils...<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>(Caps added to highlight the change in this message. The "of" following "both" is probably not needed.)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Alan<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>At 09/06/2015 10:59 PM, Grace Abuhamad wrote:<br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Forwarding again to Client Committee. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>From: Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org%20">grace.abuhamad@icann.org </a>><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 5:46 PM<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>To: Brenda Brewer <<a href="mailto:brenda.brewer@icann.org%20">brenda.brewer@icann.org </a>>, " <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" < <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Important: Final Proposal for review until 23:59UTC on 10 June<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Dear all, <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>During our meeting today, we had our 3rd and final reading of the Proposal. Changes were made live, and outstanding changes were noted as action items (see notes below). The staff team has reviewed the proposal and completed all actions listed. Please note that Sidley will provide a final review as well which includes some work on the implementation text in Section IV and the Term Sheet in Annex S. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>With this, the CWG-Stewardship now enters into a final review period that lasts until <span style='color:red'>23:59 UTC tomorrow (10 June)</span>. As noted on the call, the intention of the review period is to do a ‘proofread’ and notify the group of any errors. During this period of 26 hours, any statements or comments on the Proposal may also be sent to the group. As the Chairs noted on the call, if you are making a statement, please be sure to identify whether you do so as a member on behalf of a Chartering Organization, as an individual representing a specific organization, or as an individual with a personal remark/contribution. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>After 23:59 UTC on 10 June, the Chairs will work with staff to rectify any errors, update section VI.C. regarding statements, and deliver the Proposal to the Chartering Organizations on 11 June. Our call on 11 June will focus on how the CWG-Stewardship does its engagement, through its members and participants, to coalesce support for the Proposal among Chartering Organizations. In addition, there are two webinars on 11 June (one at 06:00 UTC and one at 13:00 UTC): <a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-06-03-en">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-06-03-en</a>. These webinars aim to provide a briefing to the broader community about the contents of the final proposal. Finally, as we head into ICANN53 in Buenos Aires, please refer to the schedule of sessions that relate to the CWG-Stewardship work: <a href="https://community.icann.org/x/EJg0Aw">https://community.icann.org/x/EJg0Aw</a>. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Thank you all for your great work and dedication to the process. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the process or administration over the next 48h. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Best, <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Gramika (Grace+Marika)<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>From: Brenda Brewer <<a href="mailto:brenda.brewer@icann.org%20">brenda.brewer@icann.org </a>><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 4:01 PM<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>To: " <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>" < <a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA #58 9 June 2015<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Dear all, <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting # 58 on 9 June 2015 are available here: <a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778032">https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778032</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Brenda<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> <br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><h2 style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Action Items<o:p></o:p></h2><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'><br><br><br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 108: Action: In document text, remove --> "as it is customary" <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 134: Action: conform text to the defined terms used in the rest of the Proposal, among other things<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 155: Action: remove capitals in "standing committee" <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Section IV: Action: Sidley to provide text on PTI implementation. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Annex H: Action: remove escalation paragraph and preamble<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Annex J: Action: edits to #3 should be cross-checked with CSC Charter <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Action: conform text to the defined terms used in the rest of the Proposal, among other things<br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><h2 style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Notes<o:p></o:p></h2><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'><br><br><br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>1. Opening Remarks<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>· A big thanks to all who contributed to edits. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>· Following closure of this meeting, staff will send final document to the CWG. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>· CWG will then have 24h to notify the group of any errors. Intention is not to reopen issues, but to focus on proofing --> DUE AT 23:59 UTC on 10 JUNE<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>· Chairs will transmit to SO/ACs on 11 June with covering note. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>2. Finalizing the Review Tool & Responses<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Can expect a final version to be circulated in the next 24h. Staff is working on consistency-checking across the responses. The document is frozen as of 1 June. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>3. Update on questions to ICANN Finance & Legal <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>The letter and responses from ICANN are posted on Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/x/7Jk0Aw">https://community.icann.org/x/7Jk0Aw. </a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Staff have included the responses in Section IV (and included an Annex to for the Finance information). <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>4. Last Review of Final Proposal <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>On screen now is version 5. The difference between the previous version and the latest is that the Chairs took some time to review which items were still open and which had been resolved. Tried to focus CWG on the key outstanding issues. This latest version also includes the DT-A annex which has now been included. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 108: Change the wording from "ringfence" to "isolate" and remove the definition in the footnote. ICANN has control and ownership of PTI and the implementation documents will assure against further transfer out of assets. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Action: In document text, remove --> "as it is customary" <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 121/ Footnote 11: footnote is satisfactory. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 125: make clear "supermajority from both" ccNSO and GNSO. Also including the CSC as part of the remit. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 128: covered by resolution in paragraph 121<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 134: SLEs discussion -- principles are included in annex and summary is included in the section now. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Action: conform text to the defined terms used in the rest of the Proposal, among other things<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Paragraph 155: Action: remove capitals in "standing committee" <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Section IV: Action: Sidley to provide text on PTI implementation. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Annex G: edit to the Remedial Action Procedures table<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Annex H: Action: remove escalation paragraph and preamble<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Annex J: Action: edits to #3 should be cross-checked with CSC Charter <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>Term Sheet: staff to revise with comments from Sidley and Greg <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>5. Overall Timeline / Milestones<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> a. Communications<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> b. Webinars on 11 June<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> c. Sessions at ICANN 53<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>6. AOB<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> a. Thursday 11 June -- 1 hour call about CWG engagement<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> b. Canceling Tuesday 16 June call <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> c. Client Committee on Friday 12 June<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'>7. Closing Remarks<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>After proposal is sent, 24h to respond with comments or statements DUE AT 23:59 UTC on 10 JUNE<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt'> <br><br><br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'>Cwg-client mailing list<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><a href="mailto:Cwg-client@icann.org">Cwg-client@icann.org</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>