<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
I think the CWG should do an assessment again the proposal for RZM to make sure that it doesn’t impact any of our work or require any substantive changes, my initial read indicates only one small change with regards to the RZM Authorisation step being removed,
the proposal suggests replacing it with an authentication step by PTI which I would suggest is a prudent approach that the CWG should endorse. But I think a methodical analysis shouldn’t take long and would be good due diligence on our part.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">-James Gannon<br class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 18 Aug 2015, at 08:31, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" class="">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class=""><a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/root_zone_administrator_proposal-relatedtoiana_functionsste-final.pdf" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class="">proposal</a></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>