<p dir="ltr">Sent from my Asus Zenfone2<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.<br>
On 26 Aug 2015 08:25, "Jonathan Robinson" <<a href="mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info">jrobinson@afilias.info</a>> wrote<br>
> <br>
><br>
> The CWG is able to formally confirm that its position is consistent with that of the other ICG RFP respondents in that the CWG has no objection to the IANA trademark and the <a href="http://IANA.ORG">IANA.ORG</a> domain name being transferred to an entity independent of the IANA Numbering Services Operator,<br>
><br>
SO:<br>
I presume you meant to write independent of "IANA functions operator"</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr"> in order to ensure that these assets are used in a non-discriminatory manner for the benefit of the entire community. For the avoidance of doubt, we view the CWG position as also consistent with the ICANN board statement of 15 August 2015 on the same subject.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> With regard to implementation of the ICG proposal, the CWG expects that, in co-ordination with the other operational communities, the detailed requirements for such an independent entity will be agreed and specified and that the appropriate independent entity will then be created or selected (and adapted if necessary) such that it can meet the detailed requirements.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Thank-you for your attention to this matter.<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Yours sincerely,<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> Jonathan & Lise<br>
><br>
> For and on behalf of the CWG<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CWG-Stewardship@icann.org">CWG-Stewardship@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship</a><br>
><br>
</p>